| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 328.2 | 298.8 | 287.3 | 220.0 | 194.6 | 191.8 | 181.4 | 165.6 | 153.3 | 139.6 | 96.9 | 79.9 |
| Cluster size | 284 | 277 | 232 | 174 | 159 | 158 | 162 | 148 | 120 | 126 | 85 | 75 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.46 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 2.23 | 2.10 | 2.56 | 2.28 | 2.25 | 2.44 | 2.08 | 2.36 | 1.76 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.81 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 1.44 | 1.59 | 1.70 | 1.18 | 1.56 | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.63 | 1.64 | 2.24 |
| 2 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 1.79 | 1.55 | 1.51 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 1.64 | 2.19 |
| 3 | 1.44 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 1.59 | 1.49 | 1.35 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 1.59 | 1.61 | 2.06 |
| 4 | 1.59 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 1.68 | 1.37 | 1.61 | 1.66 | 1.62 | 1.66 | 1.96 |
| 5 | 1.70 | 1.79 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.60 | 1.59 | 1.80 | 1.75 |
| 6 | 1.18 | 1.55 | 1.49 | 1.68 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.65 | 1.57 | 1.41 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 2.33 |
| 7 | 1.56 | 1.51 | 1.35 | 1.37 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 1.46 | 1.56 | 1.28 | 1.91 |
| 8 | 1.50 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 1.61 | 1.55 | 1.57 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 1.86 | 1.95 | 1.85 |
| 9 | 1.52 | 1.71 | 1.52 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 1.41 | 1.46 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 1.69 | 2.20 |
| 10 | 1.63 | 1.74 | 1.59 | 1.62 | 1.59 | 1.76 | 1.56 | 1.86 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.34 | 1.95 |
| 11 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.61 | 1.66 | 1.80 | 1.77 | 1.28 | 1.95 | 1.69 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| 12 | 2.24 | 2.19 | 2.06 | 1.96 | 1.75 | 2.33 | 1.91 | 1.85 | 2.20 | 1.95 | 2.10 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| 4 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| 5 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| 6 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013