| Project Name | CHEM361-G15M127 |
| Project Name | CHEM361-G15M127 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 181.9 | 170.6 | 153.2 | 151.7 | 135.8 | 100.2 | 95.0 | 88.0 | 78.6 | 73.0 | 63.4 | 59.5 |
| Cluster size | 233 | 260 | 267 | 210 | 194 | 138 | 115 | 133 | 149 | 93 | 88 | 120 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.75 | 5.97 | 5.82 | 5.86 | 3.67 | 4.19 | 6.99 | 4.66 | 4.55 | 5.55 | 7.06 | 4.56 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.15 | 1.03 | 3.43 | 3.36 | 1.89 | 3.62 | 3.18 | 3.56 | 2.59 | 3.42 |
| 2 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 3.35 | 4.43 | 3.08 | 3.23 | 3.39 | 3.00 | 3.09 | 3.20 |
| 3 | 1.15 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 1.68 | 3.27 | 3.33 | 2.14 | 3.72 | 3.00 | 3.78 | 3.02 | 3.48 |
| 4 | 1.03 | 2.04 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.60 | 2.05 | 3.44 | 3.21 | 3.22 | 2.24 | 3.22 |
| 5 | 3.43 | 3.35 | 3.27 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 3.64 | 4.61 | 2.40 | 1.82 | 3.19 | 4.64 | 2.31 |
| 6 | 3.36 | 4.43 | 3.33 | 3.60 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 3.91 | 4.24 | 3.71 | 4.64 | 4.62 | 3.83 |
| 7 | 1.89 | 3.08 | 2.14 | 2.05 | 4.61 | 3.91 | 0.00 | 4.69 | 3.99 | 4.25 | 2.50 | 4.37 |
| 8 | 3.62 | 3.23 | 3.72 | 3.44 | 2.40 | 4.24 | 4.69 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 1.56 | 4.02 | 1.32 |
| 9 | 3.18 | 3.39 | 3.00 | 3.21 | 1.82 | 3.71 | 3.99 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 4.13 | 2.43 |
| 10 | 3.56 | 3.00 | 3.78 | 3.22 | 3.19 | 4.64 | 4.25 | 1.56 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 1.92 |
| 11 | 2.59 | 3.09 | 3.02 | 2.24 | 4.64 | 4.62 | 2.50 | 4.02 | 4.13 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 3.95 |
| 12 | 3.42 | 3.20 | 3.48 | 3.22 | 2.31 | 3.83 | 4.37 | 1.32 | 2.43 | 1.92 | 3.95 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.82 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| 7 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.95 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.88 |
| 11 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.61 |
| 12 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.61 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013