| Project Name | CONTROL_1 |
| Project Name | CONTROL_1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 381.5 | 269.6 | 261.5 | 159.1 | 154.7 | 137.3 | 132.5 | 112.1 | 111.3 | 105.8 | 83.0 | 71.6 |
| Cluster size | 352 | 263 | 227 | 177 | 153 | 178 | 142 | 178 | 91 | 96 | 84 | 59 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.04 | 4.07 | 5.40 | 5.48 | 4.85 | 7.55 | 7.06 | 6.77 | 5.32 | 3.24 | 4.52 | 3.61 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 0.89 | 2.15 | 1.73 | 2.78 | 2.47 | 1.29 | 1.81 | 4.47 | 3.02 | 3.86 |
| 2 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 2.38 | 1.92 | 4.88 | 4.55 | 3.86 | 2.52 | 2.52 | 1.77 | 2.03 |
| 3 | 0.89 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 1.05 | 3.20 | 2.85 | 1.76 | 1.41 | 3.88 | 2.48 | 3.32 |
| 4 | 2.15 | 2.38 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 3.29 | 3.38 | 2.11 | 2.25 | 3.45 | 1.63 | 3.02 |
| 5 | 1.73 | 1.92 | 1.05 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 3.87 | 3.46 | 2.59 | 1.44 | 3.38 | 2.17 | 2.75 |
| 6 | 2.78 | 4.88 | 3.20 | 3.29 | 3.87 | 0.00 | 1.47 | 2.21 | 3.72 | 5.81 | 4.35 | 5.24 |
| 7 | 2.47 | 4.55 | 2.85 | 3.38 | 3.46 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 3.29 | 5.48 | 4.27 | 4.96 |
| 8 | 1.29 | 3.86 | 1.76 | 2.11 | 2.59 | 2.21 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 4.85 | 3.30 | 4.27 |
| 9 | 1.81 | 2.52 | 1.41 | 2.25 | 1.44 | 3.72 | 3.29 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 2.82 | 3.42 |
| 10 | 4.47 | 2.52 | 3.88 | 3.45 | 3.38 | 5.81 | 5.48 | 4.85 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.02 |
| 11 | 3.02 | 1.77 | 2.48 | 1.63 | 2.17 | 4.35 | 4.27 | 3.30 | 2.82 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.17 |
| 12 | 3.86 | 2.03 | 3.32 | 3.02 | 2.75 | 5.24 | 4.96 | 4.27 | 3.42 | 2.02 | 2.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
| 3 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.81 |
| 5 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| 11 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013