Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 209.0 | 161.6 | 158.2 | 150.6 | 117.4 | 109.2 | 107.2 | 103.0 | 98.0 | 58.5 | 33.4 | 31.9 |
Cluster size | 307 | 247 | 239 | 216 | 178 | 154 | 167 | 157 | 157 | 80 | 45 | 53 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 6.98 | 5.36 | 8.11 | 6.29 | 5.77 | 6.45 | 7.11 | 6.89 | 7.91 | 5.30 | 4.74 | 4.21 |
GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 3.01 | 2.85 | 2.65 | 3.24 | 2.11 | 2.38 | 2.55 | 2.74 | 3.31 | 4.43 | 5.85 |
2 | 3.01 | 0.00 | 4.31 | 2.99 | 2.71 | 2.82 | 3.30 | 3.40 | 4.28 | 2.73 | 3.18 | 4.51 |
3 | 2.85 | 4.31 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 4.58 | 3.71 | 3.35 | 3.97 | 2.31 | 4.79 | 5.86 | 7.32 |
4 | 2.65 | 2.99 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 2.32 | 2.62 | 2.34 | 3.66 | 3.00 | 3.93 | 4.94 |
5 | 3.24 | 2.71 | 4.58 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 3.18 | 4.00 | 2.87 | 3.47 | 4.73 |
6 | 2.11 | 2.82 | 3.71 | 2.32 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 2.13 | 3.46 | 2.74 | 3.76 | 5.04 |
7 | 2.38 | 3.30 | 3.35 | 2.62 | 3.08 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 3.05 | 3.53 | 4.36 | 5.80 |
8 | 2.55 | 3.40 | 3.97 | 2.34 | 3.18 | 2.13 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 3.31 | 4.24 | 5.38 |
9 | 2.74 | 4.28 | 2.31 | 3.66 | 4.00 | 3.46 | 3.05 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 4.49 | 5.61 | 6.92 |
10 | 3.31 | 2.73 | 4.79 | 3.00 | 2.87 | 2.74 | 3.53 | 3.31 | 4.49 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 4.21 |
11 | 4.43 | 3.18 | 5.86 | 3.93 | 3.47 | 3.76 | 4.36 | 4.24 | 5.61 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
12 | 5.85 | 4.51 | 7.32 | 4.94 | 4.73 | 5.04 | 5.80 | 5.38 | 6.92 | 4.21 | 3.00 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
3 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
5 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
7 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
8 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.63 |
9 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.66 |
10 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
12 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013