Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 149.9 | 114.6 | 94.9 | 93.3 | 92.7 | 75.8 | 75.7 | 65.7 | 58.5 | 58.5 | 51.1 | 50.8 |
Cluster size | 300 | 260 | 189 | 187 | 201 | 137 | 160 | 139 | 112 | 117 | 102 | 96 |
Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 4.82 | 3.38 | 5.48 | 4.44 | 3.91 | 5.10 | 4.20 | 4.66 | 6.65 | 4.71 | 4.13 | 6.26 |
GDT_TS | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.44 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 3.80 | 3.09 | 4.60 | 3.21 | 3.85 | 4.51 | 4.58 | 4.92 | 3.50 | 4.11 |
2 | 4.32 | 0.00 | 5.40 | 4.32 | 3.92 | 4.83 | 3.42 | 4.84 | 6.38 | 4.96 | 3.72 | 6.07 |
3 | 3.80 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 4.86 | 3.55 | 4.68 | 5.17 | 3.68 | 5.89 | 4.47 | 3.54 |
4 | 3.09 | 4.32 | 3.62 | 0.00 | 4.50 | 3.12 | 3.92 | 4.35 | 4.92 | 4.99 | 3.44 | 4.00 |
5 | 4.60 | 3.92 | 4.86 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 4.34 | 4.81 | 5.77 | 4.15 | 4.85 | 5.33 |
6 | 3.21 | 4.83 | 3.55 | 3.12 | 4.32 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 5.22 | 4.32 | 5.39 | 4.37 | 3.74 |
7 | 3.85 | 3.42 | 4.68 | 3.92 | 4.34 | 4.27 | 0.00 | 4.98 | 5.60 | 5.50 | 3.98 | 5.35 |
8 | 4.51 | 4.84 | 5.17 | 4.35 | 4.81 | 5.22 | 4.98 | 0.00 | 6.33 | 3.78 | 4.27 | 5.47 |
9 | 4.58 | 6.38 | 3.68 | 4.92 | 5.77 | 4.32 | 5.60 | 6.33 | 0.00 | 6.53 | 6.06 | 3.43 |
10 | 4.92 | 4.96 | 5.89 | 4.99 | 4.15 | 5.39 | 5.50 | 3.78 | 6.53 | 0.00 | 5.07 | 5.72 |
11 | 3.50 | 3.72 | 4.47 | 3.44 | 4.85 | 4.37 | 3.98 | 4.27 | 6.06 | 5.07 | 0.00 | 5.43 |
12 | 4.11 | 6.07 | 3.54 | 4.00 | 5.33 | 3.74 | 5.35 | 5.47 | 3.43 | 5.72 | 5.43 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
2 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.49 |
3 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.58 |
4 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
5 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.49 |
6 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.56 |
7 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.52 |
8 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
9 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.61 |
10 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
11 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.49 |
12 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013