Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 215.2 | 144.8 | 136.8 | 136.0 | 134.2 | 131.2 | 121.8 | 117.1 | 106.7 | 95.0 | 90.2 | 78.4 |
Cluster size | 270 | 182 | 185 | 192 | 181 | 176 | 158 | 173 | 146 | 133 | 110 | 94 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.48 | 2.64 | 2.74 | 2.77 | 2.92 | 2.95 | 2.63 | 2.91 | 3.04 | 2.85 | 2.68 | 2.33 |
GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.72 | 2.79 | 2.55 | 2.32 | 2.86 | 1.82 | 2.63 | 2.09 | 2.68 | 2.14 | 2.00 |
2 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 2.68 | 2.23 | 2.78 | 2.09 | 2.62 | 2.12 | 2.55 | 1.88 | 1.96 |
3 | 2.79 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 2.73 | 2.01 | 2.63 | 2.54 | 2.72 | 2.24 | 2.93 | 2.42 |
4 | 2.55 | 2.68 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.92 | 2.54 | 2.37 | 2.77 | 2.57 | 2.76 | 2.34 |
5 | 2.32 | 2.23 | 2.73 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 2.27 | 2.75 | 2.09 | 2.16 | 2.26 | 2.34 |
6 | 2.86 | 2.78 | 2.01 | 2.92 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.20 | 2.72 | 2.39 | 2.90 | 2.65 |
7 | 1.82 | 2.09 | 2.63 | 2.54 | 2.27 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.06 | 2.29 | 2.11 | 1.99 |
8 | 2.63 | 2.62 | 2.54 | 2.37 | 2.75 | 2.20 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 2.48 | 2.77 | 2.31 |
9 | 2.09 | 2.12 | 2.72 | 2.77 | 2.09 | 2.72 | 2.06 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.49 | 2.48 |
10 | 2.68 | 2.55 | 2.24 | 2.57 | 2.16 | 2.39 | 2.29 | 2.48 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.29 |
11 | 2.14 | 1.88 | 2.93 | 2.76 | 2.26 | 2.90 | 2.11 | 2.77 | 2.49 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
12 | 2.00 | 1.96 | 2.42 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.65 | 1.99 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 2.29 | 2.08 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
3 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.68 |
4 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.75 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
6 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
7 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
8 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
10 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
12 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013