| Project Name | Arg_Gln |
| Project Name | Arg_Gln |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 122.2 | 85.3 | 81.7 | 71.5 | 69.8 | 67.2 | 64.6 | 51.9 | 42.4 | 41.5 | 40.5 | 19.5 |
| Cluster size | 282 | 197 | 209 | 198 | 212 | 201 | 178 | 144 | 106 | 115 | 110 | 48 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.38 | 3.52 | 3.86 | 4.30 | 3.29 | 3.64 | 3.93 | 3.88 | 3.41 | 5.25 | 4.70 | 4.53 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.55 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 1.55 | 3.35 | 2.92 | 2.92 | 1.99 | 3.31 | 2.02 | 4.67 | 3.97 | 4.65 |
| 2 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 3.85 | 3.20 | 2.97 | 2.06 | 3.76 | 1.94 | 5.18 | 4.54 | 4.60 |
| 3 | 1.55 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 2.77 | 2.62 | 1.95 | 3.11 | 2.55 | 4.29 | 3.68 | 4.36 |
| 4 | 3.35 | 3.85 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 2.79 | 2.31 | 3.75 | 1.74 | 4.31 | 3.17 | 2.28 | 4.18 |
| 5 | 2.92 | 3.20 | 2.77 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 3.48 | 2.50 | 3.81 | 4.54 | 2.53 | 4.41 |
| 6 | 2.92 | 2.97 | 2.62 | 2.31 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 3.44 | 1.98 | 3.60 | 4.51 | 3.02 | 4.66 |
| 7 | 1.99 | 2.06 | 1.95 | 3.75 | 3.48 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 2.11 | 4.29 | 4.47 | 4.13 |
| 8 | 3.31 | 3.76 | 3.11 | 1.74 | 2.50 | 1.98 | 3.80 | 0.00 | 4.38 | 3.80 | 2.40 | 4.28 |
| 9 | 2.02 | 1.94 | 2.55 | 4.31 | 3.81 | 3.60 | 2.11 | 4.38 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 4.95 | 5.23 |
| 10 | 4.67 | 5.18 | 4.29 | 3.17 | 4.54 | 4.51 | 4.29 | 3.80 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 3.19 |
| 11 | 3.97 | 4.54 | 3.68 | 2.28 | 2.53 | 3.02 | 4.47 | 2.40 | 4.95 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 5.02 |
| 12 | 4.65 | 4.60 | 4.36 | 4.18 | 4.41 | 4.66 | 4.13 | 4.28 | 5.23 | 3.19 | 5.02 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.53 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.54 |
| 5 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.53 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.52 |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.81 | 0.48 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.81 |
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.49 |
| 12 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.49 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013