| Project Name | trial1 |
| Project Name | trial1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 203.7 | 163.8 | 150.7 | 137.5 | 128.2 | 126.2 | 119.5 | 110.5 | 83.1 | 64.0 | 63.5 | 60.6 |
| Cluster size | 293 | 233 | 205 | 199 | 192 | 182 | 170 | 164 | 115 | 84 | 87 | 76 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.15 | 3.49 | 4.11 | 5.05 | 5.13 | 4.87 | 4.64 | 3.13 | 4.33 | 5.14 | 4.65 | 4.53 |
| GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.17 | 3.12 | 2.91 | 2.20 | 3.13 | 3.55 | 2.60 | 2.92 | 3.12 | 2.11 |
| 2 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 1.85 | 3.64 | 3.59 | 3.03 | 3.34 | 2.70 | 2.64 | 3.58 | 3.25 | 2.46 |
| 3 | 2.17 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 2.58 | 3.44 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 3.46 | 3.22 | 2.27 |
| 4 | 3.12 | 3.64 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.89 | 2.15 | 3.33 | 2.70 | 1.98 | 2.14 | 2.83 |
| 5 | 2.91 | 3.59 | 3.33 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 2.42 | 3.45 | 2.60 | 1.97 | 2.44 | 2.79 |
| 6 | 2.20 | 3.03 | 2.58 | 2.89 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 3.15 | 2.19 | 2.84 | 2.91 | 2.27 |
| 7 | 3.13 | 3.34 | 3.44 | 2.15 | 2.42 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 3.01 | 2.25 | 2.09 | 2.07 | 2.73 |
| 8 | 3.55 | 2.70 | 3.00 | 3.33 | 3.45 | 3.15 | 3.01 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 3.50 | 3.11 | 3.10 |
| 9 | 2.60 | 2.64 | 2.65 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 2.19 | 2.25 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.47 | 2.34 |
| 10 | 2.92 | 3.58 | 3.46 | 1.98 | 1.97 | 2.84 | 2.09 | 3.50 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.90 |
| 11 | 3.12 | 3.25 | 3.22 | 2.14 | 2.44 | 2.91 | 2.07 | 3.11 | 2.47 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.79 |
| 12 | 2.11 | 2.46 | 2.27 | 2.83 | 2.79 | 2.27 | 2.73 | 3.10 | 2.34 | 2.90 | 2.79 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.63 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| 9 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 11 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013