Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 180.6 | 144.0 | 129.0 | 95.3 | 93.9 | 68.7 | 66.9 | 60.0 | 54.1 | 48.3 | 38.2 | 35.0 |
Cluster size | 357 | 284 | 267 | 190 | 176 | 125 | 138 | 123 | 107 | 90 | 77 | 66 |
Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 11.40 | 10.60 | 10.30 | 11.30 | 9.58 | 8.26 | 6.27 | 8.78 | 7.79 | 9.02 | 5.53 | 6.30 |
GDT_TS | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 3.95 | 3.31 | 4.41 | 4.07 | 6.26 | 8.65 | 5.60 | 6.86 | 5.42 | 11.00 | 9.90 |
2 | 3.95 | 0.00 | 3.76 | 5.55 | 2.93 | 5.49 | 7.86 | 4.65 | 5.64 | 4.90 | 9.90 | 9.00 |
3 | 3.31 | 3.76 | 0.00 | 4.78 | 3.29 | 5.55 | 7.60 | 4.85 | 5.68 | 5.04 | 10.50 | 8.56 |
4 | 4.41 | 5.55 | 4.78 | 0.00 | 5.06 | 6.50 | 8.20 | 6.02 | 7.57 | 5.21 | 10.90 | 10.10 |
5 | 4.07 | 2.93 | 3.29 | 5.06 | 0.00 | 4.43 | 6.69 | 3.67 | 4.64 | 3.93 | 9.24 | 8.02 |
6 | 6.26 | 5.49 | 5.55 | 6.50 | 4.43 | 0.00 | 4.73 | 3.41 | 3.92 | 3.38 | 7.71 | 6.69 |
7 | 8.65 | 7.86 | 7.60 | 8.20 | 6.69 | 4.73 | 0.00 | 5.42 | 5.23 | 5.45 | 6.29 | 5.51 |
8 | 5.60 | 4.65 | 4.85 | 6.02 | 3.67 | 3.41 | 5.42 | 0.00 | 3.87 | 3.40 | 8.41 | 6.74 |
9 | 6.86 | 5.64 | 5.68 | 7.57 | 4.64 | 3.92 | 5.23 | 3.87 | 0.00 | 4.89 | 7.84 | 5.64 |
10 | 5.42 | 4.90 | 5.04 | 5.21 | 3.93 | 3.38 | 5.45 | 3.40 | 4.89 | 0.00 | 8.55 | 7.77 |
11 | 11.00 | 9.90 | 10.50 | 10.90 | 9.24 | 7.71 | 6.29 | 8.41 | 7.84 | 8.55 | 0.00 | 7.45 |
12 | 9.90 | 9.00 | 8.56 | 10.10 | 8.02 | 6.69 | 5.51 | 6.74 | 5.64 | 7.77 | 7.45 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.40 |
2 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
3 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
4 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.34 |
5 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.38 | 0.44 |
6 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.42 |
7 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
8 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.43 |
9 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
10 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 0.45 |
11 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 1.00 | 0.41 |
12 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013