| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant56 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant56 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 111.5 | 107.5 | 106.7 | 90.2 | 82.6 | 77.2 | 57.8 | 56.1 | 51.3 | 45.3 | 44.8 | 19.8 |
| Cluster size | 265 | 220 | 255 | 184 | 207 | 174 | 98 | 143 | 140 | 142 | 103 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.02 | 4.07 | 4.46 | 5.16 | 5.20 | 4.10 | 5.91 | 4.65 | 6.02 | 5.65 | 6.76 | 6.38 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 1.46 | 1.49 | 2.87 | 2.74 | 2.66 | 2.58 | 3.45 | 2.73 | 3.87 | 3.89 |
| 2 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 3.30 | 2.92 | 0.66 | 4.89 | 1.98 | 3.68 | 3.50 | 5.79 | 4.35 |
| 3 | 1.46 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.28 | 1.73 | 3.52 | 1.74 | 3.23 | 2.61 | 4.62 | 3.72 |
| 4 | 1.49 | 3.30 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 3.73 | 3.28 | 2.84 | 3.29 | 4.06 | 3.39 | 3.77 | 4.60 |
| 5 | 2.87 | 2.92 | 2.28 | 3.73 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 4.16 | 2.47 | 2.68 | 2.08 | 4.78 | 2.54 |
| 6 | 2.74 | 0.66 | 1.73 | 3.28 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 4.90 | 2.13 | 3.56 | 3.39 | 5.68 | 4.19 |
| 7 | 2.66 | 4.89 | 3.52 | 2.84 | 4.16 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 4.24 | 4.38 | 3.46 | 3.32 | 4.43 |
| 8 | 2.58 | 1.98 | 1.74 | 3.29 | 2.47 | 2.13 | 4.24 | 0.00 | 3.81 | 3.11 | 5.56 | 4.22 |
| 9 | 3.45 | 3.68 | 3.23 | 4.06 | 2.68 | 3.56 | 4.38 | 3.81 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 4.83 | 1.51 |
| 10 | 2.73 | 3.50 | 2.61 | 3.39 | 2.08 | 3.39 | 3.46 | 3.11 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 3.89 | 2.37 |
| 11 | 3.87 | 5.79 | 4.62 | 3.77 | 4.78 | 5.68 | 3.32 | 5.56 | 4.83 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 4.49 |
| 12 | 3.89 | 4.35 | 3.72 | 4.60 | 2.54 | 4.19 | 4.43 | 4.22 | 1.51 | 2.37 | 4.49 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.85 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.89 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.99 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.82 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.62 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.89 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.60 | 0.95 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.86 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.61 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.61 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013