| Project Name | 5 |
| Project Name | 5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 171.6 | 164.4 | 164.1 | 154.8 | 148.3 | 136.8 | 117.7 | 108.4 | 101.9 | 89.7 | 87.5 | 74.7 |
| Cluster size | 237 | 207 | 210 | 210 | 192 | 188 | 164 | 130 | 129 | 98 | 123 | 112 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.34 | 3.29 | 3.59 | 3.25 | 2.72 | 3.40 | 2.79 | 3.24 | 3.15 | 3.80 | 3.25 | 3.35 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 2.52 | 2.09 | 2.90 | 1.99 | 1.96 | 2.12 | 2.29 | 2.23 |
| 2 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 1.75 | 2.59 | 1.76 | 3.05 | 1.86 | 2.19 | 2.08 | 2.13 | 1.88 |
| 3 | 2.13 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.71 | 1.83 | 3.30 | 2.04 | 2.33 | 1.88 | 2.26 | 2.02 |
| 4 | 2.12 | 1.75 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 1.92 | 3.15 | 1.89 | 2.25 | 1.92 | 2.16 | 1.46 |
| 5 | 2.52 | 2.59 | 2.71 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 2.42 | 2.48 | 2.31 | 2.95 | 2.25 | 2.73 |
| 6 | 2.09 | 1.76 | 1.83 | 1.92 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 1.85 | 2.17 | 1.93 | 2.32 | 2.00 |
| 7 | 2.90 | 3.05 | 3.30 | 3.15 | 2.42 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 2.92 | 3.58 | 2.82 | 3.11 |
| 8 | 1.99 | 1.86 | 2.04 | 1.89 | 2.48 | 1.85 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 1.89 | 2.29 | 1.97 |
| 9 | 1.96 | 2.19 | 2.33 | 2.25 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 2.92 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.17 | 2.37 |
| 10 | 2.12 | 2.08 | 1.88 | 1.92 | 2.95 | 1.93 | 3.58 | 1.89 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.09 |
| 11 | 2.29 | 2.13 | 2.26 | 2.16 | 2.25 | 2.32 | 2.82 | 2.29 | 2.17 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
| 12 | 2.23 | 1.88 | 2.02 | 1.46 | 2.73 | 2.00 | 3.11 | 1.97 | 2.37 | 2.09 | 2.42 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.87 |
| 5 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013