| Project Name | test1cut |
| Project Name | test1cut |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 174.9 | 124.3 | 124.2 | 117.8 | 117.7 | 116.4 | 114.9 | 92.4 | 79.7 | 69.9 | 53.9 | 45.5 |
| Cluster size | 283 | 206 | 200 | 189 | 196 | 214 | 184 | 148 | 118 | 117 | 82 | 63 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.99 | 4.97 | 4.16 | 4.86 | 3.58 | 4.57 | 5.00 | 4.33 | 4.62 | 3.58 | 4.42 | 4.65 |
| GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.45 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.09 | 3.42 | 4.54 | 3.10 | 3.61 | 4.07 | 3.28 | 3.90 | 3.41 | 4.11 | 3.79 |
| 2 | 4.09 | 0.00 | 3.34 | 2.91 | 4.14 | 2.61 | 2.58 | 3.02 | 2.62 | 4.58 | 3.04 | 2.76 |
| 3 | 3.42 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 3.34 | 2.97 | 3.22 | 2.85 | 3.24 | 3.95 | 3.41 | 3.10 |
| 4 | 4.54 | 2.91 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 3.06 | 3.00 | 3.61 | 2.94 | 4.39 | 2.94 | 3.36 |
| 5 | 3.10 | 4.14 | 3.34 | 4.17 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 3.98 | 3.54 | 3.92 | 2.98 | 3.43 | 3.72 |
| 6 | 3.61 | 2.61 | 2.97 | 3.06 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.83 | 2.76 | 4.03 | 2.45 | 2.67 |
| 7 | 4.07 | 2.58 | 3.22 | 3.00 | 3.98 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 2.94 | 4.70 | 3.10 | 3.03 |
| 8 | 3.28 | 3.02 | 2.85 | 3.61 | 3.54 | 2.83 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.44 | 4.19 | 3.38 | 2.65 |
| 9 | 3.90 | 2.62 | 3.24 | 2.94 | 3.92 | 2.76 | 2.94 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 4.06 | 3.01 | 3.27 |
| 10 | 3.41 | 4.58 | 3.95 | 4.39 | 2.98 | 4.03 | 4.70 | 4.19 | 4.06 | 0.00 | 3.93 | 4.26 |
| 11 | 4.11 | 3.04 | 3.41 | 2.94 | 3.43 | 2.45 | 3.10 | 3.38 | 3.01 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 3.14 |
| 12 | 3.79 | 2.76 | 3.10 | 3.36 | 3.72 | 2.67 | 3.03 | 2.65 | 3.27 | 4.26 | 3.14 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| 2 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| 3 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.59 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.61 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| 6 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.47 | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| 8 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| 9 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.51 |
| 11 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013