Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 197.8 | 174.0 | 161.8 | 150.0 | 137.2 | 107.9 | 107.6 | 102.7 | 75.9 | 71.9 | 69.9 | 56.8 |
Cluster size | 286 | 243 | 237 | 194 | 193 | 146 | 159 | 153 | 105 | 100 | 96 | 88 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.13 | 3.46 | 2.80 | 3.19 | 2.83 | 3.13 | 3.01 | 2.80 | 3.02 | 3.07 | 3.09 | 2.83 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 1.87 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 2.94 | 2.46 | 2.31 | 1.92 | 2.49 | 2.17 | 1.95 |
2 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 2.19 | 2.52 | 2.42 | 2.22 | 2.76 | 2.93 | 2.67 | 2.68 | 2.52 |
3 | 1.87 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 2.32 | 2.88 | 2.46 | 2.23 | 2.06 | 2.71 | 2.12 | 1.80 |
4 | 2.24 | 2.19 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 2.41 | 2.00 | 2.57 | 2.51 | 2.21 | 2.60 | 2.57 |
5 | 2.45 | 2.52 | 2.32 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.26 | 2.22 | 2.75 | 2.23 | 2.19 | 2.45 |
6 | 2.94 | 2.42 | 2.88 | 2.41 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.57 | 3.02 | 2.32 | 2.68 | 2.83 |
7 | 2.46 | 2.22 | 2.46 | 2.00 | 2.26 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 2.80 | 2.20 | 2.30 | 2.67 |
8 | 2.31 | 2.76 | 2.23 | 2.57 | 2.22 | 2.57 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.40 | 2.32 | 2.11 |
9 | 1.92 | 2.93 | 2.06 | 2.51 | 2.75 | 3.02 | 2.80 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 2.41 | 1.79 |
10 | 2.49 | 2.67 | 2.71 | 2.21 | 2.23 | 2.32 | 2.20 | 2.40 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 2.57 |
11 | 2.17 | 2.68 | 2.12 | 2.60 | 2.19 | 2.68 | 2.30 | 2.32 | 2.41 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
12 | 1.95 | 2.52 | 1.80 | 2.57 | 2.45 | 2.83 | 2.67 | 2.11 | 1.79 | 2.57 | 2.29 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.80 |
4 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
6 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
9 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.79 |
10 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
12 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013