Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 140.1 | 131.6 | 117.8 | 117.3 | 115.4 | 95.0 | 89.1 | 85.7 | 73.7 | 73.3 | 56.9 | 39.5 |
Cluster size | 253 | 229 | 195 | 212 | 196 | 166 | 147 | 145 | 136 | 149 | 107 | 65 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.67 | 4.35 | 4.55 | 3.79 | 3.87 | 3.59 | 3.65 | 4.17 | 4.28 | 3.04 | 3.86 | 3.34 |
GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 3.06 | 2.63 | 2.37 | 2.66 | 3.10 | 2.95 | 3.03 | 3.46 | 5.23 | 3.14 |
2 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 2.90 | 2.85 | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.32 | 3.13 | 3.93 | 5.70 | 3.32 |
3 | 3.06 | 2.96 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 3.23 | 3.34 | 3.23 | 3.00 | 2.26 | 4.30 | 5.92 | 3.60 |
4 | 2.63 | 2.90 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 3.04 | 3.36 | 3.24 | 3.60 | 2.86 | 3.32 | 5.04 | 2.77 |
5 | 2.37 | 2.85 | 3.23 | 3.04 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 3.15 | 2.91 | 3.34 | 3.41 | 5.37 | 3.38 |
6 | 2.66 | 3.41 | 3.34 | 3.36 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.95 | 2.59 | 3.30 | 3.35 | 5.31 | 3.52 |
7 | 3.10 | 3.41 | 3.23 | 3.24 | 3.15 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 3.20 | 2.80 | 4.79 | 3.08 |
8 | 2.95 | 3.32 | 3.00 | 3.60 | 2.91 | 2.59 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 4.16 | 6.04 | 4.11 |
9 | 3.03 | 3.13 | 2.26 | 2.86 | 3.34 | 3.30 | 3.20 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 4.12 | 5.83 | 3.25 |
10 | 3.46 | 3.93 | 4.30 | 3.32 | 3.41 | 3.35 | 2.80 | 4.16 | 4.12 | 0.00 | 3.70 | 2.93 |
11 | 5.23 | 5.70 | 5.92 | 5.04 | 5.37 | 5.31 | 4.79 | 6.04 | 5.83 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 4.29 |
12 | 3.14 | 3.32 | 3.60 | 2.77 | 3.38 | 3.52 | 3.08 | 4.11 | 3.25 | 2.93 | 4.29 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.66 |
2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.65 |
3 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
4 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.70 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
7 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.72 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
10 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
11 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
12 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013