| Project Name | Arg_Gln |
| Project Name | Arg_Gln |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 122.2 | 85.3 | 81.7 | 71.5 | 69.8 | 67.2 | 64.6 | 51.9 | 42.4 | 41.5 | 40.5 | 19.5 |
| Cluster size | 282 | 197 | 209 | 198 | 212 | 201 | 178 | 144 | 106 | 115 | 110 | 48 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.45 | 3.52 | 3.73 | 4.30 | 3.34 | 3.52 | 3.86 | 3.79 | 3.41 | 5.28 | 4.79 | 4.58 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 1.39 | 3.26 | 2.92 | 2.71 | 2.12 | 3.10 | 2.13 | 5.05 | 3.87 | 4.72 |
| 2 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 3.85 | 3.17 | 2.87 | 2.12 | 3.65 | 1.94 | 5.41 | 4.49 | 4.64 |
| 3 | 1.39 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 2.67 | 2.54 | 2.06 | 2.91 | 2.50 | 4.65 | 3.59 | 4.48 |
| 4 | 3.26 | 3.85 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 2.34 | 3.83 | 1.71 | 4.31 | 3.49 | 2.19 | 4.34 |
| 5 | 2.92 | 3.17 | 2.67 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 3.53 | 2.46 | 3.82 | 4.72 | 2.54 | 4.47 |
| 6 | 2.71 | 2.87 | 2.54 | 2.34 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 1.99 | 3.46 | 4.75 | 2.97 | 4.75 |
| 7 | 2.12 | 2.12 | 2.06 | 3.83 | 3.53 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.68 | 2.10 | 4.59 | 4.52 | 4.12 |
| 8 | 3.10 | 3.65 | 2.91 | 1.71 | 2.46 | 1.99 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 3.93 | 2.42 | 4.30 |
| 9 | 2.13 | 1.94 | 2.50 | 4.31 | 3.82 | 3.46 | 2.10 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 5.66 | 4.95 | 5.23 |
| 10 | 5.05 | 5.41 | 4.65 | 3.49 | 4.72 | 4.75 | 4.59 | 3.93 | 5.66 | 0.00 | 4.48 | 3.25 |
| 11 | 3.87 | 4.49 | 3.59 | 2.19 | 2.54 | 2.97 | 4.52 | 2.42 | 4.95 | 4.48 | 0.00 | 4.99 |
| 12 | 4.72 | 4.64 | 4.48 | 4.34 | 4.47 | 4.75 | 4.12 | 4.30 | 5.23 | 3.25 | 4.99 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.53 | 0.80 | 0.54 |
| 2 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.55 |
| 3 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.53 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.55 |
| 5 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 0.80 | 0.53 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.51 | 0.89 | 0.52 |
| 7 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 0.48 |
| 10 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.85 |
| 11 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.49 |
| 12 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.85 | 0.49 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013