| Project Name | katie55 |
| Project Name | katie55 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 165.3 | 161.3 | 129.5 | 123.5 | 111.8 | 100.7 | 94.7 | 86.1 | 58.1 | 54.6 | 54.5 | 35.1 |
| Cluster size | 306 | 239 | 238 | 211 | 152 | 129 | 152 | 169 | 110 | 103 | 118 | 73 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.85 | 5.40 | 5.97 | 6.12 | 6.35 | 4.75 | 3.47 | 6.46 | 5.59 | 4.39 | 7.17 | 4.19 |
| GDT_TS | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.51 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 4.16 | 3.98 | 5.04 | 2.43 | 2.99 | 4.98 | 3.67 | 3.01 | 5.32 | 2.15 |
| 2 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 3.45 | 2.93 | 3.38 | 3.85 | 3.15 | 3.90 | 4.03 | 4.60 | 3.62 |
| 3 | 4.16 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 1.78 | 3.86 | 4.35 | 2.42 | 3.75 | 4.66 | 3.84 | 4.13 |
| 4 | 3.98 | 3.45 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 4.39 | 3.35 | 4.13 | 4.19 | 1.91 | 4.27 | 3.79 | 3.83 |
| 5 | 5.04 | 2.93 | 1.78 | 4.39 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 4.92 | 2.20 | 4.83 | 5.29 | 4.40 | 4.94 |
| 6 | 2.43 | 3.38 | 3.86 | 3.35 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 4.48 | 2.97 | 2.43 | 4.62 | 1.72 |
| 7 | 2.99 | 3.85 | 4.35 | 4.13 | 4.92 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 5.02 | 3.52 | 2.53 | 5.55 | 2.47 |
| 8 | 4.98 | 3.15 | 2.42 | 4.19 | 2.20 | 4.48 | 5.02 | 0.00 | 4.26 | 4.88 | 3.34 | 4.96 |
| 9 | 3.67 | 3.90 | 3.75 | 1.91 | 4.83 | 2.97 | 3.52 | 4.26 | 0.00 | 3.44 | 3.78 | 3.51 |
| 10 | 3.01 | 4.03 | 4.66 | 4.27 | 5.29 | 2.43 | 2.53 | 4.88 | 3.44 | 0.00 | 5.49 | 2.60 |
| 11 | 5.32 | 4.60 | 3.84 | 3.79 | 4.40 | 4.62 | 5.55 | 3.34 | 3.78 | 5.49 | 0.00 | 5.34 |
| 12 | 2.15 | 3.62 | 4.13 | 3.83 | 4.94 | 1.72 | 2.47 | 4.96 | 3.51 | 2.60 | 5.34 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.86 |
| 2 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.64 |
| 3 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.61 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| 5 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.51 |
| 6 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 0.87 |
| 7 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| 8 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.54 | 0.88 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.53 |
| 9 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.66 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.58 |
| 12 | 0.86 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013