Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 191.1 | 150.3 | 119.7 | 111.6 | 102.3 | 101.5 | 85.3 | 81.9 | 80.0 | 77.5 | 72.8 | 70.8 |
Cluster size | 295 | 222 | 192 | 191 | 156 | 170 | 142 | 140 | 138 | 129 | 128 | 97 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.39 | 3.37 | 3.04 | 3.55 | 3.18 | 3.31 | 3.41 | 3.10 | 2.83 | 3.33 | 3.25 | 3.29 |
GDT_TS | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.31 | 1.97 | 2.19 | 2.09 | 1.80 | 2.29 | 2.58 | 2.68 | 2.07 | 2.23 |
2 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 2.25 | 2.10 | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.46 | 2.72 | 2.51 | 2.24 | 2.45 |
3 | 2.31 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 2.42 | 2.28 | 2.39 | 2.36 | 2.48 | 2.75 | 2.21 | 2.66 |
4 | 1.97 | 2.25 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.43 | 2.25 | 2.52 | 2.82 | 3.03 | 2.27 | 2.22 |
5 | 2.19 | 2.10 | 2.42 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.45 | 2.51 | 2.77 | 2.59 | 2.03 | 2.40 |
6 | 2.09 | 2.29 | 2.28 | 2.43 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 1.92 | 2.58 | 2.30 | 2.04 | 2.54 |
7 | 1.80 | 2.29 | 2.39 | 2.25 | 2.45 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.62 | 2.50 | 2.30 | 2.16 |
8 | 2.29 | 2.46 | 2.36 | 2.52 | 2.51 | 1.92 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.48 | 2.34 | 2.69 |
9 | 2.58 | 2.72 | 2.48 | 2.82 | 2.77 | 2.58 | 2.62 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.73 | 2.70 |
10 | 2.68 | 2.51 | 2.75 | 3.03 | 2.59 | 2.30 | 2.50 | 2.48 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 3.04 |
11 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 2.21 | 2.27 | 2.03 | 2.04 | 2.30 | 2.34 | 2.73 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
12 | 2.23 | 2.45 | 2.66 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 2.54 | 2.16 | 2.69 | 2.70 | 3.04 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
4 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
7 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
9 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
10 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
11 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013