| Project Name | APOPT1 |
| Project Name | APOPT1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 160.8 | 151.5 | 115.6 | 112.8 | 106.2 | 102.1 | 74.2 | 68.0 | 61.8 | 55.9 | 53.0 | 52.7 |
| Cluster size | 293 | 272 | 205 | 184 | 223 | 181 | 127 | 107 | 117 | 99 | 102 | 90 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 10.50 | 11.80 | 12.30 | 11.50 | 10.40 | 10.40 | 11.90 | 10.40 | 8.95 | 10.10 | 8.01 | 8.75 |
| GDT_TS | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.16 | 4.49 | 3.14 | 2.87 | 3.25 | 3.32 | 2.86 | 4.74 | 4.20 | 6.15 | 5.48 |
| 2 | 4.16 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 4.53 | 4.42 | 5.31 | 3.57 | 4.72 | 6.49 | 6.21 | 7.68 | 7.37 |
| 3 | 4.49 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 4.84 | 4.91 | 5.65 | 3.58 | 4.86 | 7.06 | 6.75 | 8.34 | 7.75 |
| 4 | 3.14 | 4.53 | 4.84 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 3.22 | 4.28 | 2.68 | 4.95 | 4.17 | 6.81 | 6.09 |
| 5 | 2.87 | 4.42 | 4.91 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 3.98 | 2.56 | 4.48 | 3.83 | 5.87 | 5.18 |
| 6 | 3.25 | 5.31 | 5.65 | 3.22 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 4.72 | 2.88 | 4.42 | 3.71 | 5.72 | 4.92 |
| 7 | 3.32 | 3.57 | 3.58 | 4.28 | 3.98 | 4.72 | 0.00 | 4.12 | 6.46 | 5.70 | 7.65 | 7.19 |
| 8 | 2.86 | 4.72 | 4.86 | 2.68 | 2.56 | 2.88 | 4.12 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 3.57 | 5.89 | 5.18 |
| 9 | 4.74 | 6.49 | 7.06 | 4.95 | 4.48 | 4.42 | 6.46 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 3.66 | 4.03 | 3.22 |
| 10 | 4.20 | 6.21 | 6.75 | 4.17 | 3.83 | 3.71 | 5.70 | 3.57 | 3.66 | 0.00 | 4.64 | 4.37 |
| 11 | 6.15 | 7.68 | 8.34 | 6.81 | 5.87 | 5.72 | 7.65 | 5.89 | 4.03 | 4.64 | 0.00 | 3.48 |
| 12 | 5.48 | 7.37 | 7.75 | 6.09 | 5.18 | 4.92 | 7.19 | 5.18 | 3.22 | 4.37 | 3.48 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.45 |
| 2 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| 3 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.38 |
| 4 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.36 | 0.39 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| 6 | 0.58 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| 7 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.36 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.46 |
| 9 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.53 |
| 11 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| 12 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013