| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 229.9 | 178.9 | 177.9 | 177.0 | 174.2 | 132.8 | 110.1 | 102.2 | 93.8 | 87.4 | 56.3 | 54.6 |
| Cluster size | 280 | 210 | 256 | 225 | 242 | 162 | 129 | 128 | 131 | 97 | 71 | 69 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 13.70 | 6.76 | 6.98 | 7.18 | 7.65 | 6.87 | 6.41 | 7.25 | 6.70 | 12.40 | 10.00 | 7.04 |
| GDT_TS | 0.50 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 11.90 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 11.80 | 11.90 | 12.00 | 11.80 | 11.90 | 11.20 | 12.70 | 12.00 |
| 2 | 11.90 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.81 | 2.83 | 2.47 | 2.08 | 2.56 | 2.79 | 10.60 | 8.65 | 2.06 |
| 3 | 12.00 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.23 | 2.47 | 2.55 | 2.48 | 2.34 | 10.60 | 8.03 | 2.77 |
| 4 | 12.00 | 2.81 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.84 | 2.48 | 2.78 | 2.66 | 10.70 | 8.26 | 2.82 |
| 5 | 11.80 | 2.83 | 2.23 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 3.01 | 2.05 | 2.51 | 10.50 | 8.53 | 2.54 |
| 6 | 11.90 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.84 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 1.79 | 2.39 | 10.60 | 8.48 | 2.19 |
| 7 | 12.00 | 2.08 | 2.55 | 2.48 | 3.01 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.85 | 2.64 | 10.80 | 8.28 | 2.40 |
| 8 | 11.80 | 2.56 | 2.48 | 2.78 | 2.05 | 1.79 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 10.70 | 8.63 | 2.25 |
| 9 | 11.90 | 2.79 | 2.34 | 2.66 | 2.51 | 2.39 | 2.64 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 10.70 | 8.24 | 2.80 |
| 10 | 11.20 | 10.60 | 10.60 | 10.70 | 10.50 | 10.60 | 10.80 | 10.70 | 10.70 | 0.00 | 11.20 | 10.60 |
| 11 | 12.70 | 8.65 | 8.03 | 8.26 | 8.53 | 8.48 | 8.28 | 8.63 | 8.24 | 11.20 | 0.00 | 8.53 |
| 12 | 12.00 | 2.06 | 2.77 | 2.82 | 2.54 | 2.19 | 2.40 | 2.25 | 2.80 | 10.60 | 8.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.81 |
| 3 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| 7 | 0.54 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| 12 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013