| Project Name | WT_Tetherin1 |
| Project Name | WT_Tetherin1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 197.2 | 136.8 | 136.3 | 112.7 | 101.6 | 84.3 | 80.8 | 80.0 | 77.7 | 59.2 | 52.2 | 24.5 |
| Cluster size | 409 | 178 | 241 | 246 | 162 | 98 | 177 | 136 | 156 | 103 | 75 | 19 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.24 | 6.64 | 6.96 | 5.68 | 6.33 | 6.18 | 6.14 | 6.86 | 5.25 | 6.10 | 6.45 | 8.02 |
| GDT_TS | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 1.36 | 1.69 | 3.59 | 7.03 | 2.74 | 3.44 | 3.24 | 2.45 | 1.82 | 3.82 |
| 2 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 3.40 | 3.16 | 1.98 | 5.83 | 3.49 | 2.35 | 2.37 | 4.11 | 3.99 | 2.85 |
| 3 | 1.36 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 3.62 | 6.82 | 3.16 | 3.83 | 3.69 | 2.38 | 1.93 | 3.78 |
| 4 | 1.69 | 3.16 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 6.97 | 2.06 | 3.44 | 2.89 | 2.84 | 2.18 | 3.91 |
| 5 | 3.59 | 1.98 | 3.62 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 4.97 | 3.58 | 2.97 | 2.59 | 3.99 | 4.36 | 3.40 |
| 6 | 7.03 | 5.83 | 6.82 | 6.97 | 4.97 | 0.00 | 6.88 | 6.70 | 6.99 | 5.80 | 8.02 | 6.45 |
| 7 | 2.74 | 3.49 | 3.16 | 2.06 | 3.58 | 6.88 | 0.00 | 3.08 | 3.50 | 3.47 | 2.97 | 3.59 |
| 8 | 3.44 | 2.35 | 3.83 | 3.44 | 2.97 | 6.70 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 4.43 | 3.95 | 2.33 |
| 9 | 3.24 | 2.37 | 3.69 | 2.89 | 2.59 | 6.99 | 3.50 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 4.49 | 3.62 | 4.17 |
| 10 | 2.45 | 4.11 | 2.38 | 2.84 | 3.99 | 5.80 | 3.47 | 4.43 | 4.49 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 4.41 |
| 11 | 1.82 | 3.99 | 1.93 | 2.18 | 4.36 | 8.02 | 2.97 | 3.95 | 3.62 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 4.34 |
| 12 | 3.82 | 2.85 | 3.78 | 3.91 | 3.40 | 6.45 | 3.59 | 2.33 | 4.17 | 4.41 | 4.34 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| 7 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.79 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.57 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013