| Project Name | EP402R_Georgia |
| Project Name | EP402R_Georgia |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 200.6 | 179.1 | 145.3 | 131.2 | 129.4 | 117.8 | 115.3 | 92.5 | 88.9 | 60.7 | 46.6 | 30.5 |
| Cluster size | 301 | 289 | 222 | 183 | 194 | 166 | 172 | 129 | 123 | 103 | 61 | 57 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.69 | 9.12 | 9.03 | 8.68 | 8.98 | 9.32 | 9.01 | 9.65 | 8.66 | 8.22 | 8.89 | 7.07 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.24 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 2.72 | 2.42 | 2.73 | 2.20 | 2.53 | 2.72 | 4.39 |
| 2 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.95 | 2.32 | 3.03 | 2.57 | 2.77 | 2.82 | 3.39 | 2.62 | 5.28 |
| 3 | 2.24 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 2.16 | 2.73 | 2.16 | 2.41 | 2.50 | 2.93 | 2.57 | 5.01 |
| 4 | 2.39 | 2.95 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 3.09 | 2.89 | 3.32 | 2.31 | 2.62 | 2.89 | 4.49 |
| 5 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 2.16 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 1.98 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 2.87 | 2.67 | 4.80 |
| 6 | 2.72 | 3.03 | 2.73 | 3.09 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.85 | 2.80 | 3.02 | 3.13 | 4.91 |
| 7 | 2.42 | 2.57 | 2.16 | 2.89 | 1.98 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 2.77 | 2.62 | 4.80 |
| 8 | 2.73 | 2.77 | 2.41 | 3.32 | 2.49 | 2.85 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 3.57 | 3.03 | 5.22 |
| 9 | 2.20 | 2.82 | 2.50 | 2.31 | 2.49 | 2.80 | 2.68 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.64 | 4.57 |
| 10 | 2.53 | 3.39 | 2.93 | 2.62 | 2.87 | 3.02 | 2.77 | 3.57 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 3.72 |
| 11 | 2.72 | 2.62 | 2.57 | 2.89 | 2.67 | 3.13 | 2.62 | 3.03 | 2.64 | 2.97 | 0.00 | 5.06 |
| 12 | 4.39 | 5.28 | 5.01 | 4.49 | 4.80 | 4.91 | 4.80 | 5.22 | 4.57 | 3.72 | 5.06 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.54 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.57 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.57 |
| 6 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.56 |
| 7 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.58 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.56 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.57 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013