| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 294.4 | 207.2 | 187.7 | 180.4 | 141.9 | 103.2 | 102.6 | 99.9 | 57.5 | 54.5 | 47.3 |
| Cluster size | 349 | 286 | 302 | 234 | 169 | 151 | 140 | 149 | 81 | 80 | 59 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 9.32 | 8.01 | 7.38 | 8.33 | 8.38 | 6.61 | 5.53 | 7.29 | 9.32 | 8.45 | 5.49 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 4.85 | 1.99 | 4.17 | 3.73 | 4.95 | 3.05 | 3.40 | 3.05 | 5.20 |
| 2 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.34 | 2.22 | 3.55 | 3.41 | 2.87 | 5.02 | 1.98 | 4.12 |
| 3 | 4.85 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 4.07 | 2.61 | 4.65 | 3.35 | 4.38 | 6.51 | 3.49 | 4.55 |
| 4 | 1.99 | 2.34 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 2.99 | 4.06 | 2.27 | 3.70 | 2.51 | 4.20 |
| 5 | 4.17 | 2.22 | 2.61 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 4.46 | 3.86 | 3.97 | 5.96 | 2.62 | 4.59 |
| 6 | 3.73 | 3.55 | 4.65 | 2.99 | 4.46 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 2.23 | 4.04 | 3.56 | 2.53 |
| 7 | 4.95 | 3.41 | 3.35 | 4.06 | 3.86 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 5.87 | 3.90 | 3.16 |
| 8 | 3.05 | 2.87 | 4.38 | 2.27 | 3.97 | 2.23 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 2.75 | 3.21 |
| 9 | 3.40 | 5.02 | 6.51 | 3.70 | 5.96 | 4.04 | 5.87 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 4.71 | 5.18 |
| 10 | 3.05 | 1.98 | 3.49 | 2.51 | 2.62 | 3.56 | 3.90 | 2.75 | 4.71 | 0.00 | 4.24 |
| 11 | 5.20 | 4.12 | 4.55 | 4.20 | 4.59 | 2.53 | 3.16 | 3.21 | 5.18 | 4.24 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 2 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013