| Project Name | WT |
| Project Name | WT |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 162.0 | 102.9 | 86.6 | 75.4 | 64.1 | 52.9 | 49.5 | 49.4 | 47.1 | 44.8 | 37.7 | 33.2 |
| Cluster size | 334 | 227 | 193 | 183 | 231 | 156 | 156 | 95 | 175 | 79 | 90 | 81 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 12.40 | 11.60 | 13.10 | 12.40 | 13.50 | 11.30 | 12.10 | 11.40 | 14.40 | 15.40 | 11.40 | 12.00 |
| GDT_TS | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.37 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 1.38 | 1.81 | 3.13 | 4.24 | 3.12 | 5.70 | 4.63 | 5.59 | 2.28 | 6.19 |
| 2 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 3.73 | 3.54 | 3.79 | 4.01 | 1.78 | 4.53 | 5.24 | 6.23 | 3.76 | 4.86 |
| 3 | 1.38 | 3.73 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 3.07 | 4.70 | 3.57 | 6.39 | 4.57 | 5.36 | 2.73 | 6.78 |
| 4 | 1.81 | 3.54 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 4.34 | 3.46 | 6.15 | 4.98 | 5.52 | 2.20 | 6.63 |
| 5 | 3.13 | 3.79 | 3.07 | 3.38 | 0.00 | 4.43 | 2.89 | 6.35 | 3.09 | 4.15 | 4.32 | 6.16 |
| 6 | 4.24 | 4.01 | 4.70 | 4.34 | 4.43 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 6.55 | 5.50 | 5.14 | 4.70 | 6.43 |
| 7 | 3.12 | 1.78 | 3.57 | 3.46 | 2.89 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 5.03 | 4.60 | 5.47 | 4.12 | 5.03 |
| 8 | 5.70 | 4.53 | 6.39 | 6.15 | 6.35 | 6.55 | 5.03 | 0.00 | 6.73 | 8.23 | 6.08 | 2.49 |
| 9 | 4.63 | 5.24 | 4.57 | 4.98 | 3.09 | 5.50 | 4.60 | 6.73 | 0.00 | 3.64 | 5.75 | 6.00 |
| 10 | 5.59 | 6.23 | 5.36 | 5.52 | 4.15 | 5.14 | 5.47 | 8.23 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 6.56 | 7.66 |
| 11 | 2.28 | 3.76 | 2.73 | 2.20 | 4.32 | 4.70 | 4.12 | 6.08 | 5.75 | 6.56 | 0.00 | 6.77 |
| 12 | 6.19 | 4.86 | 6.78 | 6.63 | 6.16 | 6.43 | 5.03 | 2.49 | 6.00 | 7.66 | 6.77 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.50 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.42 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.46 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.52 |
| 5 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.44 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.49 |
| 6 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.47 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.52 |
| 8 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.44 |
| 10 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.44 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.51 |
| 12 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013