| Project Name | 16 |
| Project Name | 16 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 295.3 | 280.9 | 272.7 | 198.5 | 161.8 | 139.7 | 123.8 | 70.4 | 62.7 | 46.5 | 33.0 | 13.3 |
| Cluster size | 316 | 318 | 325 | 216 | 189 | 156 | 149 | 105 | 80 | 72 | 51 | 23 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.46 | 3.25 | 3.34 | 3.07 | 3.34 | 3.37 | 3.33 | 2.98 | 2.83 | 3.19 | 3.50 | 3.11 |
| GDT_TS | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.84 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 1.47 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.46 | 1.74 | 1.74 | 2.35 | 1.59 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 1.53 | 0.64 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 1.46 | 1.47 | 1.76 | 2.31 | 1.40 |
| 3 | 0.55 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 1.40 | 1.79 | 1.75 | 2.26 | 1.60 |
| 4 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 1.51 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 2.27 | 2.01 | 1.87 | 2.00 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 1.33 | 1.32 | 1.67 | 2.38 | 1.24 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.51 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 1.46 | 1.72 | 1.65 | 2.25 | 1.52 |
| 7 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.55 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 1.39 | 1.50 | 1.83 | 2.38 | 1.46 |
| 8 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.46 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 2.14 | 2.18 | 1.70 |
| 9 | 1.74 | 1.47 | 1.79 | 2.27 | 1.32 | 1.72 | 1.50 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 2.85 | 0.99 |
| 10 | 1.74 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 2.01 | 1.67 | 1.65 | 1.83 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 1.77 |
| 11 | 2.35 | 2.31 | 2.26 | 1.87 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 2.38 | 2.18 | 2.85 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.75 |
| 12 | 1.59 | 1.40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.46 | 1.70 | 0.99 | 1.77 | 2.75 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| 4 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| 5 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| 7 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| 8 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.88 |
| 9 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| 10 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.92 |
| 11 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013