| Project Name | chuitya |
| Project Name | chuitya |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 184.1 | 160.5 | 152.7 | 145.2 | 143.4 | 131.1 | 128.7 | 115.0 | 104.0 | 91.6 | 88.1 | 66.9 |
| Cluster size | 252 | 213 | 208 | 188 | 188 | 176 | 167 | 148 | 135 | 123 | 116 | 86 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.56 | 2.88 | 2.56 | 2.76 | 2.46 | 2.50 | 2.84 | 2.73 | 2.70 | 2.63 | 2.76 | 2.44 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.00 | 2.33 | 2.07 | 1.95 | 2.41 | 2.12 | 2.07 | 1.79 | 2.25 | 2.19 |
| 2 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.27 | 2.12 | 1.99 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 2.07 | 2.62 | 2.32 | 2.47 |
| 3 | 2.00 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 1.92 | 1.91 | 2.29 | 2.31 | 2.28 | 2.44 | 2.21 | 2.53 |
| 4 | 2.33 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 1.99 | 2.26 | 2.45 | 2.63 | 2.87 | 2.34 | 2.60 |
| 5 | 2.07 | 2.12 | 1.92 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.27 | 2.19 | 2.14 | 2.58 | 2.04 | 2.43 |
| 6 | 1.95 | 1.99 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.29 | 2.26 | 2.45 | 2.27 | 2.33 |
| 7 | 2.41 | 2.31 | 2.29 | 2.26 | 2.27 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.71 | 2.96 | 2.43 | 2.90 |
| 8 | 2.12 | 2.17 | 2.31 | 2.45 | 2.19 | 2.29 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.41 | 2.51 | 2.51 |
| 9 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.28 | 2.63 | 2.14 | 2.26 | 2.71 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.27 | 2.26 |
| 10 | 1.79 | 2.62 | 2.44 | 2.87 | 2.58 | 2.45 | 2.96 | 2.41 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 2.09 |
| 11 | 2.25 | 2.32 | 2.21 | 2.34 | 2.04 | 2.27 | 2.43 | 2.51 | 2.27 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.51 |
| 12 | 2.19 | 2.47 | 2.53 | 2.60 | 2.43 | 2.33 | 2.90 | 2.51 | 2.26 | 2.09 | 2.51 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.63 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| 8 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013