| Project Name | E51G |
| Project Name | E51G |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 102.4 | 82.1 | 77.2 | 73.0 | 69.3 | 62.3 | 59.1 | 54.9 | 50.0 | 47.1 | 42.1 | 34.8 |
| Cluster size | 269 | 203 | 235 | 148 | 174 | 176 | 164 | 129 | 128 | 156 | 125 | 93 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.26 | 4.27 | 5.49 | 4.31 | 4.34 | 4.86 | 6.46 | 5.71 | 5.26 | 6.77 | 6.58 | 7.04 |
| GDT_TS | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.58 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 1.53 | 3.02 | 2.96 | 3.40 | 2.71 | 3.90 | 2.04 | 4.90 | 4.31 | 4.34 |
| 2 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 3.38 | 3.47 | 2.55 | 4.73 | 4.90 | 2.80 | 6.01 | 4.70 | 5.43 |
| 3 | 1.53 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 3.20 | 3.13 | 3.39 | 2.42 | 3.75 | 2.23 | 4.91 | 4.50 | 4.35 |
| 4 | 3.02 | 3.38 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 3.09 | 4.40 | 3.20 | 3.01 | 5.49 | 5.24 | 5.37 |
| 5 | 2.96 | 3.47 | 3.13 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 4.21 | 3.03 | 3.11 | 5.46 | 5.30 | 5.42 |
| 6 | 3.40 | 2.55 | 3.39 | 3.09 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 4.26 | 2.82 | 5.87 | 4.64 | 4.62 |
| 7 | 2.71 | 4.73 | 2.42 | 4.40 | 4.21 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 4.06 | 3.18 | 5.29 | 4.33 | 4.05 |
| 8 | 3.90 | 4.90 | 3.75 | 3.20 | 3.03 | 4.26 | 4.06 | 0.00 | 4.23 | 5.26 | 6.35 | 6.10 |
| 9 | 2.04 | 2.80 | 2.23 | 3.01 | 3.11 | 2.82 | 3.18 | 4.23 | 0.00 | 5.18 | 3.92 | 4.11 |
| 10 | 4.90 | 6.01 | 4.91 | 5.49 | 5.46 | 5.87 | 5.29 | 5.26 | 5.18 | 0.00 | 5.80 | 6.11 |
| 11 | 4.31 | 4.70 | 4.50 | 5.24 | 5.30 | 4.64 | 4.33 | 6.35 | 3.92 | 5.80 | 0.00 | 2.38 |
| 12 | 4.34 | 5.43 | 4.35 | 5.37 | 5.42 | 4.62 | 4.05 | 6.10 | 4.11 | 6.11 | 2.38 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| 2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.58 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.49 | 0.55 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| 11 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.82 |
| 12 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013