| Project Name | 7d |
| Project Name | 7d |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 241.6 | 213.0 | 212.7 | 142.3 | 139.2 | 115.3 | 86.3 | 80.8 | 79.9 | 69.3 | 59.2 | 44.1 |
| Cluster size | 322 | 285 | 296 | 181 | 171 | 174 | 108 | 95 | 116 | 96 | 89 | 67 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.07 | 4.11 | 3.76 | 4.01 | 4.24 | 4.11 | 3.62 | 5.50 | 3.49 | 3.47 | 3.95 | 3.49 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.59 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 3.17 | 2.70 | 3.09 | 3.27 | 2.92 | 3.26 | 3.35 | 3.27 | 3.61 | 4.02 |
| 2 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 2.93 | 3.27 | 2.97 | 3.41 | 3.57 | 3.13 | 3.88 | 4.08 |
| 3 | 3.17 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.42 | 2.84 | 3.12 | 4.07 | 2.89 | 3.01 | 3.48 | 3.72 |
| 4 | 2.70 | 2.60 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 3.09 | 2.47 | 3.49 | 3.34 | 3.20 | 3.76 | 4.12 |
| 5 | 3.09 | 2.93 | 3.42 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 3.40 | 3.38 | 3.83 | 3.53 | 4.34 | 4.36 |
| 6 | 3.27 | 3.27 | 2.84 | 3.09 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 3.22 | 3.97 | 2.90 | 3.03 | 3.00 | 3.46 |
| 7 | 2.92 | 2.97 | 3.12 | 2.47 | 3.40 | 3.22 | 0.00 | 4.11 | 3.13 | 3.08 | 3.88 | 3.97 |
| 8 | 3.26 | 3.41 | 4.07 | 3.49 | 3.38 | 3.97 | 4.11 | 0.00 | 4.55 | 4.27 | 4.76 | 5.22 |
| 9 | 3.35 | 3.57 | 2.89 | 3.34 | 3.83 | 2.90 | 3.13 | 4.55 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 2.84 | 3.15 |
| 10 | 3.27 | 3.13 | 3.01 | 3.20 | 3.53 | 3.03 | 3.08 | 4.27 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 3.31 | 3.29 |
| 11 | 3.61 | 3.88 | 3.48 | 3.76 | 4.34 | 3.00 | 3.88 | 4.76 | 2.84 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 2.92 |
| 12 | 4.02 | 4.08 | 3.72 | 4.12 | 4.36 | 3.46 | 3.97 | 5.22 | 3.15 | 3.29 | 2.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.55 |
| 4 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.52 |
| 6 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| 8 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.47 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 10 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.65 |
| 12 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013