| Project Name | EM89 |
| Project Name | EM89 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 124.2 | 109.8 | 104.3 | 94.3 | 92.4 | 75.6 | 53.7 | 53.4 | 53.1 | 43.6 | 42.2 |
| Cluster size | 281 | 286 | 241 | 259 | 182 | 135 | 147 | 130 | 98 | 138 | 103 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 6.44 | 6.41 | 12.10 | 14.00 | 14.90 | 9.00 | 13.90 | 15.80 | 11.10 | 7.27 | 6.90 |
| GDT_TS | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.45 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.06 | 11.50 | 13.50 | 14.10 | 8.11 | 13.30 | 14.80 | 10.70 | 4.68 | 3.49 |
| 2 | 4.06 | 0.00 | 10.10 | 11.70 | 13.00 | 6.00 | 11.60 | 13.90 | 8.76 | 5.07 | 5.03 |
| 3 | 11.50 | 10.10 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 4.76 | 5.21 | 3.97 | 6.57 | 2.86 | 9.32 | 12.00 |
| 4 | 13.50 | 11.70 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 5.02 | 6.61 | 3.30 | 6.16 | 3.79 | 10.90 | 13.30 |
| 5 | 14.10 | 13.00 | 4.76 | 5.02 | 0.00 | 8.84 | 5.67 | 3.72 | 6.63 | 11.90 | 14.40 |
| 6 | 8.11 | 6.00 | 5.21 | 6.61 | 8.84 | 0.00 | 7.01 | 10.00 | 3.63 | 5.97 | 8.51 |
| 7 | 13.30 | 11.60 | 3.97 | 3.30 | 5.67 | 7.01 | 0.00 | 5.47 | 4.81 | 10.60 | 13.20 |
| 8 | 14.80 | 13.90 | 6.57 | 6.16 | 3.72 | 10.00 | 5.47 | 0.00 | 8.02 | 12.30 | 14.90 |
| 9 | 10.70 | 8.76 | 2.86 | 3.79 | 6.63 | 3.63 | 4.81 | 8.02 | 0.00 | 8.39 | 10.70 |
| 10 | 4.68 | 5.07 | 9.32 | 10.90 | 11.90 | 5.97 | 10.60 | 12.30 | 8.39 | 0.00 | 4.46 |
| 11 | 3.49 | 5.03 | 12.00 | 13.30 | 14.40 | 8.51 | 13.20 | 14.90 | 10.70 | 4.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.47 |
| 3 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.35 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.32 |
| 5 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.33 |
| 6 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.36 |
| 7 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.35 |
| 8 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| 9 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.35 |
| 10 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.53 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013