Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 176.0 | 151.7 | 139.0 | 122.4 | 122.3 | 119.5 | 117.1 | 109.6 | 95.9 | 85.7 | 63.6 | 61.3 |
Cluster size | 271 | 227 | 195 | 167 | 186 | 170 | 161 | 168 | 141 | 130 | 91 | 93 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.91 | 2.47 | 2.79 | 2.89 | 2.94 | 2.91 | 2.93 | 2.81 | 3.16 | 2.85 | 2.84 | 3.03 |
GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 2.18 | 2.05 | 1.99 | 2.35 | 2.34 | 1.96 | 2.05 | 1.89 | 2.38 | 1.90 |
2 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 1.93 | 2.16 | 2.22 | 1.99 | 2.34 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 2.00 |
3 | 2.18 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 2.12 | 1.94 | 1.88 | 2.33 | 2.07 | 2.45 | 2.31 | 2.27 |
4 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.34 | 2.49 | 2.32 | 2.55 | 2.05 | 2.35 | 2.15 |
5 | 1.99 | 1.93 | 2.12 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.37 | 2.21 | 1.96 | 2.13 | 2.16 | 2.11 |
6 | 2.35 | 2.16 | 1.94 | 2.34 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.42 | 2.36 | 2.31 | 2.40 | 2.37 |
7 | 2.34 | 2.22 | 1.88 | 2.49 | 2.37 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.22 | 2.57 | 2.54 | 2.22 |
8 | 1.96 | 1.99 | 2.33 | 2.32 | 2.21 | 2.42 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.24 | 2.47 | 2.32 |
9 | 2.05 | 2.34 | 2.07 | 2.55 | 1.96 | 2.36 | 2.22 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 2.55 | 2.40 |
10 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 2.45 | 2.05 | 2.13 | 2.31 | 2.57 | 2.24 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 2.36 |
11 | 2.38 | 1.84 | 2.31 | 2.35 | 2.16 | 2.40 | 2.54 | 2.47 | 2.55 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
12 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.27 | 2.15 | 2.11 | 2.37 | 2.22 | 2.32 | 2.40 | 2.36 | 2.45 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
4 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
5 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
6 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
8 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
9 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
10 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
11 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013