| Project Name | om |
| Project Name | om |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 289.9 | 275.4 | 173.6 | 172.9 | 166.6 | 130.9 | 130.1 | 124.5 | 116.8 | 92.4 | 73.9 | 50.5 |
| Cluster size | 328 | 319 | 189 | 194 | 188 | 147 | 145 | 136 | 133 | 85 | 77 | 59 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.79 | 2.86 | 2.91 | 3.07 | 2.86 | 3.04 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 2.82 | 2.93 | 3.04 | 2.60 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 1.74 | 2.22 | 2.31 | 1.94 | 2.18 | 1.97 | 1.69 | 2.49 | 2.16 | 2.36 |
| 2 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.41 | 2.55 | 1.90 | 2.66 | 2.86 |
| 3 | 1.74 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.44 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.05 | 1.67 | 2.46 | 2.08 | 2.34 |
| 4 | 2.22 | 1.77 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 2.12 | 2.15 | 2.29 | 2.42 | 2.10 | 2.37 | 2.78 |
| 5 | 2.31 | 1.69 | 2.44 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.31 | 2.54 | 2.65 | 1.94 | 2.59 | 2.77 |
| 6 | 1.94 | 2.26 | 2.01 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 2.07 | 2.16 | 2.51 | 2.10 | 2.45 |
| 7 | 2.18 | 2.29 | 2.01 | 2.15 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 2.19 | 2.39 | 2.20 | 2.61 |
| 8 | 1.97 | 2.41 | 2.05 | 2.29 | 2.54 | 2.07 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 2.69 | 1.91 | 2.46 |
| 9 | 1.69 | 2.55 | 1.67 | 2.42 | 2.65 | 2.16 | 2.19 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.16 | 2.41 |
| 10 | 2.49 | 1.90 | 2.46 | 2.10 | 1.94 | 2.51 | 2.39 | 2.69 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 2.82 |
| 11 | 2.16 | 2.66 | 2.08 | 2.37 | 2.59 | 2.10 | 2.20 | 1.91 | 2.16 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| 12 | 2.36 | 2.86 | 2.34 | 2.78 | 2.77 | 2.45 | 2.61 | 2.46 | 2.41 | 2.82 | 2.03 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| 8 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013