| Project Name | c.o.o. |
| Project Name | c.o.o. |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 226.9 | 173.2 | 139.9 | 137.7 | 133.2 | 132.9 | 113.4 | 101.7 | 82.1 | 69.8 | 59.4 | 29.1 |
| Cluster size | 312 | 245 | 206 | 208 | 196 | 172 | 152 | 161 | 119 | 91 | 87 | 51 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.37 | 3.25 | 3.15 | 3.47 | 3.34 | 2.67 | 2.36 | 3.13 | 2.95 | 2.77 | 2.94 | 2.33 |
| GDT_TS | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.80 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.25 | 1.45 | 1.66 | 1.78 | 2.28 | 2.85 | 1.76 | 2.97 | 2.63 | 3.06 | 2.58 |
| 2 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.34 | 1.51 | 1.34 | 2.13 | 2.73 | 1.25 | 2.70 | 2.47 | 2.79 | 2.51 |
| 3 | 1.45 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 1.37 | 2.20 | 2.59 | 1.56 | 2.82 | 2.59 | 2.92 | 2.14 |
| 4 | 1.66 | 1.51 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 2.38 | 3.01 | 1.49 | 2.85 | 2.46 | 2.62 | 2.79 |
| 5 | 1.78 | 1.34 | 1.37 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.88 | 1.50 | 2.76 | 2.67 | 2.78 | 2.47 |
| 6 | 2.28 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 2.38 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 1.96 | 2.13 | 1.77 | 1.76 | 1.94 |
| 7 | 2.85 | 2.73 | 2.59 | 3.01 | 2.88 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 1.72 | 2.42 | 2.39 | 1.44 |
| 8 | 1.76 | 1.25 | 1.56 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 1.96 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.22 | 2.37 | 2.28 |
| 9 | 2.97 | 2.70 | 2.82 | 2.85 | 2.76 | 2.13 | 1.72 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.18 | 2.16 |
| 10 | 2.63 | 2.47 | 2.59 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 1.77 | 2.42 | 2.22 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 2.56 |
| 11 | 3.06 | 2.79 | 2.92 | 2.62 | 2.78 | 1.76 | 2.39 | 2.37 | 2.18 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 2.63 |
| 12 | 2.58 | 2.51 | 2.14 | 2.79 | 2.47 | 1.94 | 1.44 | 2.28 | 2.16 | 2.56 | 2.63 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 4 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| 5 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.86 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| 9 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.84 |
| 10 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013