Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 192.3 | 187.7 | 129.1 | 115.4 | 112.8 | 103.5 | 102.5 | 99.2 | 92.6 | 88.9 | 79.4 | 65.6 |
Cluster size | 296 | 269 | 185 | 175 | 164 | 153 | 140 | 146 | 134 | 132 | 113 | 93 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 4.48 | 12.50 | 6.85 | 8.23 | 4.10 | 4.47 | 9.11 | 6.62 | 3.71 | 4.05 | 6.81 | 5.57 |
GDT_TS | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.45 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 13.00 | 6.60 | 9.13 | 4.21 | 4.16 | 10.40 | 8.17 | 3.71 | 3.38 | 6.89 | 5.20 |
2 | 13.00 | 0.00 | 13.50 | 13.20 | 12.20 | 13.00 | 15.60 | 13.60 | 12.40 | 12.20 | 12.90 | 12.20 |
3 | 6.60 | 13.50 | 0.00 | 7.71 | 5.25 | 5.78 | 9.24 | 7.33 | 6.89 | 6.53 | 9.76 | 8.18 |
4 | 9.13 | 13.20 | 7.71 | 0.00 | 7.92 | 7.57 | 7.78 | 5.93 | 8.89 | 8.94 | 11.30 | 10.30 |
5 | 4.21 | 12.20 | 5.25 | 7.92 | 0.00 | 3.52 | 9.17 | 6.61 | 3.85 | 3.65 | 7.59 | 5.41 |
6 | 4.16 | 13.00 | 5.78 | 7.57 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 8.63 | 6.23 | 4.67 | 4.53 | 8.48 | 6.26 |
7 | 10.40 | 15.60 | 9.24 | 7.78 | 9.17 | 8.63 | 0.00 | 4.25 | 10.40 | 10.40 | 12.90 | 11.80 |
8 | 8.17 | 13.60 | 7.33 | 5.93 | 6.61 | 6.23 | 4.25 | 0.00 | 7.69 | 7.93 | 10.50 | 9.31 |
9 | 3.71 | 12.40 | 6.89 | 8.89 | 3.85 | 4.67 | 10.40 | 7.69 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 5.71 | 4.41 |
10 | 3.38 | 12.20 | 6.53 | 8.94 | 3.65 | 4.53 | 10.40 | 7.93 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 6.28 | 3.96 |
11 | 6.89 | 12.90 | 9.76 | 11.30 | 7.59 | 8.48 | 12.90 | 10.50 | 5.71 | 6.28 | 0.00 | 4.68 |
12 | 5.20 | 12.20 | 8.18 | 10.30 | 5.41 | 6.26 | 11.80 | 9.31 | 4.41 | 3.96 | 4.68 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
2 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.47 |
3 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 0.39 |
4 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.53 |
5 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.52 |
6 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.52 |
7 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.46 |
8 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.48 |
9 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
10 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.58 |
11 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
12 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013