| Project Name | RU-md |
| Project Name | RU-md |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 178.0 | 140.8 | 139.7 | 124.7 | 72.0 | 65.9 | 61.1 | 59.2 | 57.1 | 54.2 | 37.3 | 29.9 |
| Cluster size | 337 | 288 | 291 | 237 | 140 | 128 | 123 | 107 | 103 | 115 | 73 | 58 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.62 | 4.88 | 4.67 | 5.66 | 5.58 | 4.55 | 5.21 | 4.12 | 5.11 | 4.52 | 4.95 | 3.45 |
| GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.59 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.34 | 3.58 | 2.28 | 3.93 | 3.80 | 3.32 | 4.41 | 4.30 | 4.12 | 3.25 | 5.18 |
| 2 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 3.03 | 3.56 | 3.23 | 2.60 | 3.72 | 3.55 | 3.42 | 2.93 | 4.32 |
| 3 | 3.58 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 3.25 | 3.48 | 3.01 | 2.69 | 3.59 | 3.42 | 2.90 | 3.15 | 4.27 |
| 4 | 2.28 | 3.03 | 3.25 | 0.00 | 3.35 | 3.71 | 2.91 | 4.41 | 4.12 | 4.04 | 3.32 | 5.31 |
| 5 | 3.93 | 3.56 | 3.48 | 3.35 | 0.00 | 3.72 | 3.64 | 4.67 | 3.09 | 3.86 | 4.03 | 5.34 |
| 6 | 3.80 | 3.23 | 3.01 | 3.71 | 3.72 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 3.29 | 3.99 | 2.83 | 3.68 | 3.84 |
| 7 | 3.32 | 2.60 | 2.69 | 2.91 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 4.22 | 3.40 | 2.73 | 4.91 |
| 8 | 4.41 | 3.72 | 3.59 | 4.41 | 4.67 | 3.29 | 4.21 | 0.00 | 3.79 | 3.71 | 3.65 | 3.19 |
| 9 | 4.30 | 3.55 | 3.42 | 4.12 | 3.09 | 3.99 | 4.22 | 3.79 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 3.74 | 4.46 |
| 10 | 4.12 | 3.42 | 2.90 | 4.04 | 3.86 | 2.83 | 3.40 | 3.71 | 3.63 | 0.00 | 3.49 | 3.88 |
| 11 | 3.25 | 2.93 | 3.15 | 3.32 | 4.03 | 3.68 | 2.73 | 3.65 | 3.74 | 3.49 | 0.00 | 4.14 |
| 12 | 5.18 | 4.32 | 4.27 | 5.31 | 5.34 | 3.84 | 4.91 | 3.19 | 4.46 | 3.88 | 4.14 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.52 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.54 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.49 |
| 5 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.52 |
| 6 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 7 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.53 |
| 8 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.51 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| 11 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 12 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013