| Project Name | MKMUT127 |
| Project Name | MKMUT127 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 140.1 | 101.7 | 95.9 | 90.6 | 64.7 | 52.5 | 48.2 | 47.7 | 46.3 | 46.3 | 43.1 | 32.8 |
| Cluster size | 368 | 226 | 185 | 264 | 128 | 101 | 134 | 122 | 176 | 166 | 70 | 60 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.73 | 5.75 | 4.89 | 3.67 | 6.36 | 6.57 | 2.85 | 7.00 | 4.99 | 5.51 | 6.41 | 7.58 |
| GDT_TS | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.60 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.93 | 2.96 | 1.73 | 4.94 | 7.14 | 2.78 | 5.43 | 3.31 | 5.90 | 4.42 | 7.27 |
| 2 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 4.05 | 3.72 | 8.54 | 5.68 | 3.84 | 4.93 | 7.22 | 3.19 | 5.32 |
| 3 | 2.96 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 3.43 | 7.86 | 4.69 | 3.85 | 4.31 | 6.58 | 2.92 | 5.77 |
| 4 | 1.73 | 4.05 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 5.09 | 6.74 | 2.78 | 5.38 | 2.39 | 5.95 | 4.65 | 7.21 |
| 5 | 4.94 | 3.72 | 3.43 | 5.09 | 0.00 | 8.16 | 6.21 | 1.83 | 5.52 | 6.45 | 2.34 | 5.42 |
| 6 | 7.14 | 8.54 | 7.86 | 6.74 | 8.16 | 0.00 | 7.14 | 8.16 | 5.89 | 4.55 | 8.32 | 8.98 |
| 7 | 2.78 | 5.68 | 4.69 | 2.78 | 6.21 | 7.14 | 0.00 | 6.91 | 4.29 | 6.02 | 5.98 | 8.18 |
| 8 | 5.43 | 3.84 | 3.85 | 5.38 | 1.83 | 8.16 | 6.91 | 0.00 | 5.55 | 6.69 | 2.48 | 5.31 |
| 9 | 3.31 | 4.93 | 4.31 | 2.39 | 5.52 | 5.89 | 4.29 | 5.55 | 0.00 | 5.90 | 5.16 | 7.37 |
| 10 | 5.90 | 7.22 | 6.58 | 5.95 | 6.45 | 4.55 | 6.02 | 6.69 | 5.90 | 0.00 | 6.63 | 7.58 |
| 11 | 4.42 | 3.19 | 2.92 | 4.65 | 2.34 | 8.32 | 5.98 | 2.48 | 5.16 | 6.63 | 0.00 | 5.91 |
| 12 | 7.27 | 5.32 | 5.77 | 7.21 | 5.42 | 8.98 | 8.18 | 5.31 | 7.37 | 7.58 | 5.91 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.60 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
| 11 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013