| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 179.0 | 169.1 | 168.9 | 146.6 | 146.3 | 139.0 | 130.0 | 122.7 | 113.3 | 104.1 | 80.3 | 67.7 |
| Cluster size | 236 | 214 | 240 | 175 | 184 | 180 | 146 | 158 | 157 | 132 | 104 | 74 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.70 | 5.03 | 7.44 | 5.89 | 4.88 | 6.03 | 4.72 | 4.95 | 4.45 | 8.34 | 4.64 | 4.48 |
| GDT_TS | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 6.80 | 4.50 | 3.63 | 4.25 | 2.98 | 2.48 | 4.28 | 7.21 | 2.57 | 2.45 |
| 2 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 6.87 | 3.49 | 3.76 | 5.85 | 2.46 | 3.57 | 4.61 | 5.83 | 3.30 | 3.25 |
| 3 | 6.80 | 6.87 | 0.00 | 7.12 | 6.00 | 7.40 | 6.39 | 7.41 | 6.47 | 8.88 | 6.90 | 6.63 |
| 4 | 4.50 | 3.49 | 7.12 | 0.00 | 4.42 | 6.93 | 3.50 | 4.93 | 4.74 | 5.28 | 4.60 | 4.31 |
| 5 | 3.63 | 3.76 | 6.00 | 4.42 | 0.00 | 5.17 | 3.62 | 3.94 | 3.57 | 6.26 | 3.98 | 3.44 |
| 6 | 4.25 | 5.85 | 7.40 | 6.93 | 5.17 | 0.00 | 5.57 | 4.21 | 5.42 | 9.47 | 4.49 | 4.67 |
| 7 | 2.98 | 2.46 | 6.39 | 3.50 | 3.62 | 5.57 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 4.27 | 6.18 | 3.09 | 2.95 |
| 8 | 2.48 | 3.57 | 7.41 | 4.93 | 3.94 | 4.21 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 4.52 | 7.25 | 2.79 | 2.72 |
| 9 | 4.28 | 4.61 | 6.47 | 4.74 | 3.57 | 5.42 | 4.27 | 4.52 | 0.00 | 7.17 | 4.53 | 3.84 |
| 10 | 7.21 | 5.83 | 8.88 | 5.28 | 6.26 | 9.47 | 6.18 | 7.25 | 7.17 | 0.00 | 7.08 | 6.59 |
| 11 | 2.57 | 3.30 | 6.90 | 4.60 | 3.98 | 4.49 | 3.09 | 2.79 | 4.53 | 7.08 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
| 12 | 2.45 | 3.25 | 6.63 | 4.31 | 3.44 | 4.67 | 2.95 | 2.72 | 3.84 | 6.59 | 2.65 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| 4 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| 6 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.68 |
| 9 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| 11 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013