| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant100 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant100 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 89.4 | 86.3 | 83.0 | 75.1 | 74.5 | 62.1 | 56.8 | 55.8 | 55.1 | 50.7 | 44.9 | 35.0 |
| Cluster size | 211 | 167 | 225 | 204 | 201 | 164 | 186 | 130 | 175 | 125 | 116 | 96 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.96 | 5.24 | 6.59 | 6.99 | 6.82 | 7.44 | 7.62 | 9.16 | 6.57 | 6.46 | 5.78 | 6.18 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.54 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.78 | 3.61 | 4.11 | 4.11 | 4.69 | 4.74 | 6.61 | 3.88 | 3.45 | 2.14 | 3.26 |
| 2 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 3.53 | 2.88 | 4.13 | 4.09 | 6.07 | 3.38 | 3.45 | 2.62 | 2.02 |
| 3 | 3.61 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.72 | 4.50 | 4.02 | 5.99 | 3.44 | 4.31 | 3.14 | 2.87 |
| 4 | 4.11 | 3.53 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 3.34 | 2.91 | 3.00 | 4.26 | 2.10 | 3.80 | 4.58 | 3.80 |
| 5 | 4.11 | 2.88 | 2.72 | 3.34 | 0.00 | 3.94 | 3.88 | 5.93 | 4.09 | 3.91 | 3.90 | 3.34 |
| 6 | 4.69 | 4.13 | 4.50 | 2.91 | 3.94 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 3.36 | 3.22 | 3.27 | 5.42 | 4.39 |
| 7 | 4.74 | 4.09 | 4.02 | 3.00 | 3.88 | 3.15 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 2.61 | 3.47 | 5.45 | 3.76 |
| 8 | 6.61 | 6.07 | 5.99 | 4.26 | 5.93 | 3.36 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.84 | 5.13 | 7.47 | 5.65 |
| 9 | 3.88 | 3.38 | 3.44 | 2.10 | 4.09 | 3.22 | 2.61 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 4.57 | 3.31 |
| 10 | 3.45 | 3.45 | 4.31 | 3.80 | 3.91 | 3.27 | 3.47 | 5.13 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 3.99 |
| 11 | 2.14 | 2.62 | 3.14 | 4.58 | 3.90 | 5.42 | 5.45 | 7.47 | 4.57 | 4.32 | 0.00 | 2.97 |
| 12 | 3.26 | 2.02 | 2.87 | 3.80 | 3.34 | 4.39 | 3.76 | 5.65 | 3.31 | 3.99 | 2.97 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.72 |
| 8 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.73 |
| 9 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.62 |
| 11 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013