| Project Name | mutationlf |
| Project Name | mutationlf |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 154.6 | 135.5 | 87.8 | 87.6 | 84.2 | 79.7 | 50.0 | 49.8 | 44.2 | 36.7 | 31.1 | 22.0 |
| Cluster size | 333 | 288 | 201 | 199 | 218 | 199 | 128 | 115 | 107 | 78 | 88 | 46 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.89 | 2.93 | 3.32 | 3.47 | 3.62 | 3.62 | 4.20 | 3.40 | 4.74 | 3.21 | 4.45 | 5.06 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.03 | 2.23 | 2.70 | 2.19 | 3.32 | 2.50 | 4.04 | 2.01 | 3.66 | 4.74 |
| 2 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 1.96 | 2.84 | 2.33 | 2.94 | 1.44 | 3.79 | 1.79 | 3.69 | 4.07 |
| 3 | 2.03 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 1.31 | 1.62 | 1.90 | 2.39 | 1.99 | 3.00 | 1.61 | 2.68 | 3.86 |
| 4 | 2.23 | 1.96 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.58 | 1.77 | 2.28 | 2.04 | 3.08 | 1.49 | 3.03 | 4.15 |
| 5 | 2.70 | 2.84 | 1.62 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.50 | 2.76 | 2.99 | 2.26 | 2.70 | 4.26 |
| 6 | 2.19 | 2.33 | 1.90 | 1.77 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.68 | 3.65 | 1.97 | 3.57 | 4.13 |
| 7 | 3.32 | 2.94 | 2.39 | 2.28 | 2.50 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 2.87 | 2.66 | 2.83 |
| 8 | 2.50 | 1.44 | 1.99 | 2.04 | 2.76 | 2.68 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 2.04 | 3.48 | 3.87 |
| 9 | 4.04 | 3.79 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 2.99 | 3.65 | 2.40 | 3.58 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 1.80 | 2.86 |
| 10 | 2.01 | 1.79 | 1.61 | 1.49 | 2.26 | 1.97 | 2.87 | 2.04 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 3.72 | 4.62 |
| 11 | 3.66 | 3.69 | 2.68 | 3.03 | 2.70 | 3.57 | 2.66 | 3.48 | 1.80 | 3.72 | 0.00 | 3.32 |
| 12 | 4.74 | 4.07 | 3.86 | 4.15 | 4.26 | 4.13 | 2.83 | 3.87 | 2.86 | 4.62 | 3.32 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
| 3 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.72 |
| 8 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013