| Project Name | Tetherine120 |
| Project Name | Tetherine120 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 157.1 | 119.5 | 116.3 | 77.5 | 57.3 | 55.6 | 53.8 | 48.6 | 35.3 | 29.7 | 26.8 | 18.2 |
| Cluster size | 304 | 303 | 282 | 193 | 163 | 170 | 163 | 122 | 116 | 78 | 55 | 51 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.9 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.30 | 4.33 | 4.07 | 4.49 | 4.95 | 5.34 | 5.72 | 4.26 | 5.83 | 6.45 | 6.37 | 5.01 |
| GDT_TS | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.58 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 1.12 | 1.47 | 2.58 | 2.98 | 3.47 | 2.29 | 4.31 | 5.61 | 6.48 | 5.14 |
| 2 | 2.96 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 3.27 | 2.42 | 3.25 | 2.90 | 4.45 | 4.46 | 5.57 | 6.25 | 4.81 |
| 3 | 1.12 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.66 | 3.43 | 3.63 | 2.45 | 4.30 | 5.66 | 6.38 | 5.05 |
| 4 | 1.47 | 3.27 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.52 | 3.86 | 2.38 | 4.94 | 6.05 | 6.50 | 5.58 |
| 5 | 2.58 | 2.42 | 2.66 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 2.49 | 3.85 | 3.72 | 4.95 | 5.94 | 4.61 |
| 6 | 2.98 | 3.25 | 3.43 | 3.52 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 4.05 | 3.34 | 4.58 | 6.69 | 4.30 |
| 7 | 3.47 | 2.90 | 3.63 | 3.86 | 2.49 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 4.37 | 2.93 | 3.82 | 6.11 | 4.28 |
| 8 | 2.29 | 4.45 | 2.45 | 2.38 | 3.85 | 4.05 | 4.37 | 0.00 | 4.84 | 5.35 | 5.48 | 4.89 |
| 9 | 4.31 | 4.46 | 4.30 | 4.94 | 3.72 | 3.34 | 2.93 | 4.84 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 6.50 | 4.71 |
| 10 | 5.61 | 5.57 | 5.66 | 6.05 | 4.95 | 4.58 | 3.82 | 5.35 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 5.50 | 3.41 |
| 11 | 6.48 | 6.25 | 6.38 | 6.50 | 5.94 | 6.69 | 6.11 | 5.48 | 6.50 | 5.50 | 0.00 | 4.48 |
| 12 | 5.14 | 4.81 | 5.05 | 5.58 | 4.61 | 4.30 | 4.28 | 4.89 | 4.71 | 3.41 | 4.48 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.54 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.55 |
| 4 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.56 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.55 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.61 |
| 8 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.53 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013