| Project Name | mutationalr |
| Project Name | mutationalr |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 122.2 | 90.9 | 78.9 | 70.8 | 69.2 | 55.6 | 42.1 | 40.9 | 40.7 | 37.2 | 32.4 | 15.4 |
| Cluster size | 332 | 272 | 204 | 189 | 217 | 188 | 122 | 134 | 135 | 63 | 106 | 38 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.46 | 3.67 | 3.43 | 4.48 | 3.12 | 3.68 | 3.15 | 4.05 | 4.53 | 2.70 | 4.82 | 5.59 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 1.46 | 4.48 | 1.95 | 3.24 | 2.17 | 3.58 | 4.82 | 3.74 | 5.38 | 4.86 |
| 2 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 3.86 | 2.41 | 2.97 | 1.86 | 2.47 | 3.84 | 3.85 | 4.53 | 4.65 |
| 3 | 1.46 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 4.37 | 1.85 | 2.71 | 2.18 | 3.70 | 4.94 | 3.38 | 5.32 | 4.95 |
| 4 | 4.48 | 3.86 | 4.37 | 0.00 | 5.11 | 4.92 | 4.04 | 3.28 | 3.40 | 5.09 | 2.88 | 4.71 |
| 5 | 1.95 | 2.41 | 1.85 | 5.11 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 2.49 | 3.67 | 4.59 | 2.89 | 5.19 | 4.45 |
| 6 | 3.24 | 2.97 | 2.71 | 4.92 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 3.08 | 3.75 | 3.56 | 3.93 | 4.76 |
| 7 | 2.17 | 1.86 | 2.18 | 4.04 | 2.49 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 4.46 | 3.07 | 4.67 | 5.28 |
| 8 | 3.58 | 2.47 | 3.70 | 3.28 | 3.67 | 3.08 | 3.32 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 4.57 | 2.99 | 3.91 |
| 9 | 4.82 | 3.84 | 4.94 | 3.40 | 4.59 | 3.75 | 4.46 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 5.12 | 2.77 | 3.48 |
| 10 | 3.74 | 3.85 | 3.38 | 5.09 | 2.89 | 3.56 | 3.07 | 4.57 | 5.12 | 0.00 | 4.58 | 6.16 |
| 11 | 5.38 | 4.53 | 5.32 | 2.88 | 5.19 | 3.93 | 4.67 | 2.99 | 2.77 | 4.58 | 0.00 | 4.87 |
| 12 | 4.86 | 4.65 | 4.95 | 4.71 | 4.45 | 4.76 | 5.28 | 3.91 | 3.48 | 6.16 | 4.87 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.79 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| 4 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.83 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| 9 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| 10 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
| 12 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013