| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant103 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant103 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 113.7 | 83.2 | 79.0 | 68.0 | 67.2 | 57.0 | 54.7 | 45.2 | 43.1 | 39.0 | 38.6 | 33.6 |
| Cluster size | 251 | 226 | 224 | 189 | 199 | 188 | 144 | 114 | 129 | 121 | 110 | 105 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.61 | 3.97 | 3.21 | 3.71 | 3.65 | 4.80 | 3.75 | 3.86 | 5.06 | 5.36 | 6.28 | 3.64 |
| GDT_TS | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 1.86 | 0.84 | 3.59 | 4.55 | 3.22 | 1.37 | 4.38 | 4.44 | 6.32 | 2.83 |
| 2 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.99 | 1.97 | 4.36 | 1.52 | 3.94 | 2.83 | 3.51 | 5.63 | 2.97 |
| 3 | 1.86 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 2.90 | 4.51 | 2.59 | 2.59 | 3.93 | 4.39 | 6.41 | 3.07 |
| 4 | 0.84 | 2.99 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 4.22 | 2.97 | 1.71 | 3.93 | 4.00 | 6.16 | 2.61 |
| 5 | 3.59 | 1.97 | 2.90 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 3.64 | 2.21 | 4.33 | 2.85 | 3.55 | 5.43 | 2.67 |
| 6 | 4.55 | 4.36 | 4.51 | 4.22 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 4.79 | 5.12 | 3.27 | 3.22 | 3.43 | 2.49 |
| 7 | 3.22 | 1.52 | 2.59 | 2.97 | 2.21 | 4.79 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 3.28 | 3.95 | 6.13 | 3.30 |
| 8 | 1.37 | 3.94 | 2.59 | 1.71 | 4.33 | 5.12 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 5.21 | 5.10 | 6.88 | 3.57 |
| 9 | 4.38 | 2.83 | 3.93 | 3.93 | 2.85 | 3.27 | 3.28 | 5.21 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 4.36 | 3.02 |
| 10 | 4.44 | 3.51 | 4.39 | 4.00 | 3.55 | 3.22 | 3.95 | 5.10 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 4.23 | 3.08 |
| 11 | 6.32 | 5.63 | 6.41 | 6.16 | 5.43 | 3.43 | 6.13 | 6.88 | 4.36 | 4.23 | 0.00 | 4.54 |
| 12 | 2.83 | 2.97 | 3.07 | 2.61 | 2.67 | 2.49 | 3.30 | 3.57 | 3.02 | 3.08 | 4.54 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.91 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.74 |
| 5 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.62 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 0.70 |
| 6 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.61 | 0.89 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.67 |
| 8 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.55 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.72 |
| 11 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.59 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013