| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant89 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant89 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 89.9 | 81.4 | 79.4 | 73.9 | 67.9 | 61.8 | 53.9 | 50.0 | 49.4 | 36.7 | 29.5 | 18.5 |
| Cluster size | 243 | 230 | 235 | 214 | 182 | 187 | 181 | 151 | 126 | 118 | 83 | 50 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.85 | 5.03 | 5.52 | 4.85 | 5.42 | 5.04 | 5.94 | 5.42 | 5.05 | 5.46 | 5.70 | 6.90 |
| GDT_TS | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 0.55 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 3.47 | 2.20 | 3.24 | 2.82 | 2.70 | 4.58 | 1.92 | 5.28 | 5.84 | 5.84 |
| 2 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 2.09 | 3.40 | 2.70 | 2.42 | 4.05 | 1.72 | 5.14 | 5.68 | 5.59 |
| 3 | 3.47 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 4.20 | 2.46 | 3.75 | 2.05 | 3.63 | 5.85 | 5.79 | 5.79 |
| 4 | 2.20 | 2.09 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 2.22 | 2.70 | 3.37 | 2.38 | 4.81 | 5.17 | 5.21 |
| 5 | 3.24 | 3.40 | 4.20 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 3.27 | 4.91 | 3.90 | 6.52 | 6.51 | 6.05 |
| 6 | 2.82 | 2.70 | 2.46 | 2.22 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 3.28 | 2.88 | 5.77 | 5.80 | 6.09 |
| 7 | 2.70 | 2.42 | 3.75 | 2.70 | 3.27 | 4.05 | 0.00 | 4.38 | 3.30 | 4.49 | 5.08 | 4.40 |
| 8 | 4.58 | 4.05 | 2.05 | 3.37 | 4.91 | 3.28 | 4.38 | 0.00 | 4.53 | 6.01 | 5.61 | 5.62 |
| 9 | 1.92 | 1.72 | 3.63 | 2.38 | 3.90 | 2.88 | 3.30 | 4.53 | 0.00 | 5.83 | 6.56 | 6.40 |
| 10 | 5.28 | 5.14 | 5.85 | 4.81 | 6.52 | 5.77 | 4.49 | 6.01 | 5.83 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 3.52 |
| 11 | 5.84 | 5.68 | 5.79 | 5.17 | 6.51 | 5.80 | 5.08 | 5.61 | 6.56 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 3.03 |
| 12 | 5.84 | 5.59 | 5.79 | 5.21 | 6.05 | 6.09 | 4.40 | 5.62 | 6.40 | 3.52 | 3.03 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| 3 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.76 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| 7 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013