| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 97.3 | 95.3 | 73.1 | 65.3 | 57.7 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 46.0 | 43.9 | 41.2 | 36.2 | 21.9 |
| Cluster size | 283 | 223 | 207 | 148 | 217 | 172 | 150 | 131 | 169 | 129 | 127 | 44 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.72 | 4.31 | 6.42 | 2.79 | 4.73 | 5.49 | 3.49 | 5.66 | 6.78 | 4.95 | 4.57 | 9.13 |
| GDT_TS | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.50 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.46 | 2.27 | 4.79 | 4.75 | 2.96 | 3.95 | 4.01 | 5.41 | 2.21 | 4.80 | 5.84 |
| 2 | 4.46 | 0.00 | 4.60 | 2.72 | 3.96 | 4.38 | 2.72 | 2.33 | 4.47 | 4.01 | 3.63 | 7.47 |
| 3 | 2.27 | 4.60 | 0.00 | 5.30 | 4.84 | 3.33 | 4.46 | 4.05 | 5.10 | 3.58 | 5.01 | 5.05 |
| 4 | 4.79 | 2.72 | 5.30 | 0.00 | 3.89 | 4.50 | 2.01 | 3.81 | 5.04 | 4.12 | 3.46 | 8.02 |
| 5 | 4.75 | 3.96 | 4.84 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 3.08 | 3.88 | 4.95 | 4.45 | 3.60 | 6.60 |
| 6 | 2.96 | 4.38 | 3.33 | 4.50 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 3.90 | 4.56 | 2.80 | 4.14 | 5.10 |
| 7 | 3.95 | 2.72 | 4.46 | 2.01 | 3.08 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.20 | 4.74 | 3.29 | 3.05 | 7.12 |
| 8 | 4.01 | 2.33 | 4.05 | 3.81 | 3.88 | 3.90 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 4.23 | 3.62 | 6.34 |
| 9 | 5.41 | 4.47 | 5.10 | 5.04 | 4.95 | 4.56 | 4.74 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 5.46 | 5.03 | 4.74 |
| 10 | 2.21 | 4.01 | 3.58 | 4.12 | 4.45 | 2.80 | 3.29 | 4.23 | 5.46 | 0.00 | 4.69 | 6.59 |
| 11 | 4.80 | 3.63 | 5.01 | 3.46 | 3.60 | 4.14 | 3.05 | 3.62 | 5.03 | 4.69 | 0.00 | 7.15 |
| 12 | 5.84 | 7.47 | 5.05 | 8.02 | 6.60 | 5.10 | 7.12 | 6.34 | 4.74 | 6.59 | 7.15 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.82 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.87 | 0.59 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.59 | 0.77 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.56 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.57 |
| 9 | 0.57 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.57 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.54 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.82 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013